Third Party Press

RESEARCH PROJECT - Mod. 71 and Mod. 71/84 - Craig Brown

These are both exceptional looking Mauser 71s. While i'm sure Paul will add these to the 71 research, if you do individual threads for them i would love to add them to the reference.

I am not sure I understand exactly what you are saying.
Are you saying that if I start a separate thread for each rifle, you will add them to "a reference".

I am not sure what reference you are referring to.

I was under an impression that this thread was a reference for someone doing research and a book.

Is there yet another reference?

I am just trying to get my head around what you are asking.
I have not been active on this forum for most of my time here.
So, I am not well informed on what everyone is doing.

I will happily start another thread for these rifles, I just want to understand what you are expecting on the new thread.

forgive me my ignorance,
Richard
 
Last edited:
I am not sure I understand exactly what you are saying.
Are you saying that if I start a separate thread for each rifle, you will add them to "a reference".

I am not sure what reference you are referring to.

I was under an impression that this thread was a reference for someone doing research and a book.

Is there yet another reference?

I am just trying to get my head around what you are asking.
I have not been active on this forum for most of my time here.
So, I am not well informed on what everyone is doing.

I will happily start another thread for these rifles, I just want to understand what you are expecting on the new thread.

forgive me my ignorance,
Richard
HI RIchard--

This thread is tracking of SNs etc. for a long running project. I think what he was trying to say is that both the rifles you posted were gems and deserved their own new posts in the imperial section.

We have a separate thread linked to various individual rifle posts to serve as a reference to collectors and showcase nice examples.
 
HI RIchard--

This thread is tracking of SNs etc. for a long running project. I think what he was trying to say is that both the rifles you posted were gems and deserved their own new posts in the imperial section.

We have a separate thread linked to various individual rifle posts to serve as a reference to collectors and showcase nice examples.
Hi Chrisftk,

Thank you for the information.

Can you tell me where to put a new thread for my rifles or, better yet, would you post a link to the thread that links all the others?
That way I can peruse the threads to see what is expected in the way of pictures and information to post.

Thanks for you help...
Richard
 
Hi Chrisftk,

Thank you for the information.

Can you tell me where to put a new thread for my rifles or, better yet, would you post a link to the thread that links all the others?
That way I can peruse the threads to see what is expected in the way of pictures and information to post.

Thanks for you help...
Richard
Here is the index of other threads:


You can create a new thread by clicking the big orange "post thread" button on the top right of the forum:

BS0aRdj.png
 
Can you tell me where to put a new thread for my rifles or, better yet, would you post a link to the thread that links all the others?
That way I can peruse the threads to see what is expected in the way of pictures and information to post.

Thanks for you help...
Richard
Hi, Richard

Here is an example of one that i photographed. (These are older pictures before i got better with lighting, but still gives you an idea of what markings to document.)

Thank you for your willingness to post more photos! If you need any help along the way feel free to message me.
 
Here is the index of other threads:


You can create a new thread by clicking the big orange "post thread" button on the top right of the forum:

BS0aRdj.png
Thanks for posting the link, I had forgotten about the index thread.
 
I am not sure if these latter posts are a jab or not, but this is my project and has nothing to do with moderation, - I started this because of CB's legacy, it was far more than just these obscure variations, he was a great man in this and many fields (his book credits are numerous) but this was just his latest project we collaborated in. He died in the middle of setting this up and is why the outlines are unfinished. In the history of this hobby there is no American collector that measures up to his legacy, - and I mean no one!!

As to the moderation of this forum, I generally leave actual moderation to Chris because I generally do not have the temperament for policing in any form, - I do not censor if at all possible, probably when I do it is reactive rather than preventive, but I retain the functions only for self-protection as only Hambone has been a bigger victim of forum moderator stifling...

*** this thread was primarily designed to host the end result of reporting on the larger forum, not designed to be a forum for such reporting, the latter is fine and productive, but i try to link reporting results to reported threads in the hyperlinks of each report (to preserve continuity).
 
Re-reading the above, I should mention a fellow Arizonian, Jon Speed, who is probably the only equal American collector with CB's reputation... though this is obvious to any collector who has been around.
 
Definitely worth it. The fact alone that it’s Wurttemberg accepted makes it worthy of detailed study. Plus it’s looks very original, I’d take more original over higher condition any day.
Finally got around to making a thread on this rifle:

 
Also just spotted this one on GB. Auction is ending in 7 minutes, but it's a barreled receiver that's been chopped to boot. Not worth even the sub-$100 asking price unless you want a paper weight, but still a data point. I saved pics if anyone wants or needs them:

WMO. I.G. Mod 71, 1876, C/W, SN 2172B, receiver +barrel only.
 
Last edited:
Also just spotted this one on GB. Auction is ending in 7 minutes, but it's a barreled receiver that's been chopped to boot. Not worth even the sub-$100 asking price unless you want a paper weight, but still a data point. I saved pics if anyone wants or needs them:

WMO. I.G. Mod 71, 1878, C/W, SN 2172B, receiver +barrel only.
Are you certain of the date and serial suffix? It isn't consistent with current trends, but added it the study (just confirming the observation, not a criticism...)
 
Are you certain of the date and serial suffix? It isn't consistent with current trends, but added it the study (just confirming the observation, not a criticism...)
Nope, good catch. I'm just a doofus who typoed it. Date should be 1876, corrected above. Sorry about that. I'll drop some pics in now that the auction is closed
 

Attachments

  • pix081941983.jpg
    pix081941983.jpg
    178.5 KB · Views: 8
  • pix537498971.jpg
    pix537498971.jpg
    288.5 KB · Views: 8
  • pix638374632.jpg
    pix638374632.jpg
    156.8 KB · Views: 9
  • pix654449231.jpg
    pix654449231.jpg
    142.2 KB · Views: 8
  • pix794095288.jpg
    pix794095288.jpg
    174.4 KB · Views: 8
  • pix429390233.jpg
    pix429390233.jpg
    264.5 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
I just got this 1871 Jägerbüchse here recently. It is definitely seen better days. The manufacturer mark is there but it's extremely light mostly damaged from all the rust and pitting. Here is the rifles information with three photos.
1875-1876/ÖWG/7052E/E.4.119.
20240811_201957.jpg
20240811_202109.jpg

20240811_202141.jpg
 
Nope, good catch. I'm just a doofus who typoed it. Date should be 1876, corrected above. Sorry about that. I'll drop some pics in now that the auction is closed
I suspected a typo but you never know what is possible, these days what I once thought impossible happens all the time! Thanks for the correction and pictures!
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top