Happy New Year to all from Munich, Germany.
I would like your thoughts on this EF64 M42 Camo please - it is sourced near Stuttgart, Germany. I have looked at it in hand and it has:
a) Nice wear/rubbing showing feathering of paint layers.
b) Dull patina showing average, but not excessive knocks and bangs.
c) White remnants of what could be 'Whitewash' on the leather of the strap.
d) Paint seems to have been roller applied and not by spraygun or brush.
e) 1942 dated liner, assembled in the workcamps of occupied Lodz, Poland.
I am not sure what field of combat this helmet was last used - but could be from Winter to Spring seasons of combat/activity.
Thanks for your time.
EF
EF, none of these critiques are the 'kiss of death' in themselves. I add up everything and then make a decision.
a) You will often find questionable camos with a feathering of the paint layers that can be seen on rims especially. This suggests that there were multiple coats of paint applied to the entire shell to produce the camo.
During the war, commodities were often in limited supply and were used/distributed sparingly/cautiously; fuel, food, paint, etc.... These limits do not exist for postwar camo artists and often slop on lots of paint in their attempts to create believable camos. As a general rule, the more paint layering I see on a camo the more I see it as a red flag.
b) I see a richness to the paint that is a red flag. I
do not see a dull flatness due to age and oxidation I see on originals. Very minimal wear, a few knocks and dings here and there. Beware of those camos that have that 'used but not abused look'. Forgers are mindful that camo collectors are looking for camos with some wear but not too much.
c) Possibly whitewash remnants on the authentic interior, but it should be evident on the exterior as well, which it is not. Tunisian/Italian two color tan/green camo with snow camo remnants ??
d) Camos (and reissues) are found both brush and spray applied, possibly even by other methods such as rag applied. With the 3 color RAL Normandy scheme, those helmets done at the unit level are most often seen spray applied. I would be leery of any brush applied Normandy scheme. Many questionable Normandys are brush applied because the faker cannot procure
correct RAL spray paint.
Rivets have been removed at some point and do not have matching camo (liner out when camo applied?) This is invariably a red flag. There is no conceivable reason for liners to have been removed for a field camo job.
Conclusion: a nice move prop for an Africa/Italian front themed war movie.
What is the lot# on this one? Probably an SD Heer ?