Here are two of my favorite Mitchell's pictures.
First off, the funny one:
It's a 1917 dated Spandau Model WWII German Mauser K98k guys!
I wish I knew what was in the box. The charitable read would be it's a humped Gew98 that they just didn't want to make a new box for. It could also be one of the SS rebuilds that got caught up by the Russians, went through the RC process, and then trickled back to the US that way. That idea is. . . less amusing. I mean, I don't like humped imperial guns either but at the end of the day a bog standard Spandau 1917 is less of a loss than one of the SS rebuilds.
And now for the one that's just fraudulent.
Everything in that is a goddamned lie.
1) Mauser K98k rifle "designated M48"
2) produced with German technology and tooling
3) in occupied Serbia
4) preserved since WW2. The gun wasn't made during WW2.
5) the final line about it being a WW2 Mauser.
6) the implication that the 1943 on the crest has anything to do with the year the gun was produced. Now they don't outright SAY it, but it's clearly what the reader is meant to take away. For anyone who cares the communist Yugoslav crest had 29-XI-1943 on it to commemorate the date that the post-war political organization of the country was decided on - 29 November '43.
Then there's all the rest about it being all matching etc. Now, I have no doubt that a fair few of them were, since a lot of the M48s that came in were. But I've also heard that they renumbered parts if it wasn't already matching and defended that as part of their "refurb" process. Same with re-bluing. Supposedly this was more of a problem on the later rifles, the ones with the advertisements where they were more clear about them being post-war Yugoslavian, since the ones of this era were the earlier imports that were of generally higher quality. Can't confirm that myself so take it as collector lore, but it tracks with how the company is absolutely confirmed to have behaved with the RC K98ks.
Plus how they keep hammering in on German quality and German steel and German reliability. Don't get me wrong. The Yugoslavians could make a fine firearm. In fact, I'll be the first one to line up and explain how all that emphasis on German precision and quality etc. is frequently BS, and doubly so when you're talking about the waning days of WW2. I'm 100% there for that conversation if people want to have it. But, competent craftsmen that they may be, the Yugoslavians very much were NOT Germans, and the men and women of the generation who produced this rifle would probably have punched you for implying they were. Given, you know, recent history coloring their attitudes towards their Teutonic neighbors to the north.
Anyways, Mitchell's sucks and it's a testament to how badly they sucked that, at least a decade (more?) after they finally went out of business that we still have people coming around to ask about them and if the guns are any good.