Third Party Press

k98k won't close on cartrideg.

That's fine with me. I'm going to work up a 170 grain load anyways. I have a bunch of bullets in that weight already. A few more wont hurt. Some are pulled from duds of original 178 grain 8mm ammo. I'll pm you.
 
There was a problem with out of spec cases in some of that Romanian commercial ammo. It looks the same as the Romanian surplus except for a green lacquer sealant around the bullet instead of red for the surplus ammo. I bought some of this from Sportsman's guide awhile back and it would not chamber in ANY of my 8mm rifles. I have had no issue with Romanian surplus.
Here is some of the ammo in question...

How in the hell did they get it so wrong..?

I mean c'mon...its 8-fukn-mm..how many ba-zillion rds of that have been made over the years.

And it doesnt sound like it was just a couple of boxes...seems like it was a lot...didnt anybody @ the plant try to chamber an occaisional round in a spec jig..?

WTF...?
 
How in the hell did they get it so wrong..?

I mean c'mon...its 8-fukn-mm..how many ba-zillion rds of that have been made over the years.

And it doesnt sound like it was just a couple of boxes...seems like it was a lot...didnt anybody @ the plant try to chamber an occaisional round in a spec jig..?

WTF...?[/QUOTE

Trust me, they managed to get it wrong. It is absolute crap ammo. I bought 10 boxes of the sh!t and tried random rounds from all 10 boxes. IT SUCKS !!!!! We used a wooden mallet to force the bolt closed on all 5 guns. I was in total disbelief that the ammo was so damned bad. Not one of guns were damaged, but that was not the fault of the ammo. It tried it's best.
 
How in the hell did they get it so wrong..?

I mean c'mon...its 8-fukn-mm..how many ba-zillion rds of that have been made over the years.

And it doesnt sound like it was just a couple of boxes...seems like it was a lot...didnt anybody @ the plant try to chamber an occaisional round in a spec jig..?

WTF...?[/QUOTE

Trust me, they managed to get it wrong. It is absolute crap ammo. I bought 10 boxes of the sh!t and tried random rounds from all 10 boxes. IT SUCKS !!!!! We used a wooden mallet to force the bolt closed on all 5 guns. I was in total disbelief that the ammo was so damned bad. Not one of guns were damaged, but that was not the fault of the ammo. It tried it's best.

yeah, I put 15 or so of the 20 rounds in my rifle and none of them worked. I bought 198 grain PPU which chambered fine as I noted earlier. I thought 198 was the standard service load but someone told me it was more like 170. Which was it? Any particular weight most people shoot out of their rifles of this era? I hope I'm not overloading it with 198.
 
Don't ammunition manufactures have to recall defective ammunition? Not chambering would be a defect in my book.
 
yeah, I put 15 or so of the 20 rounds in my rifle and none of them worked. I bought 198 grain PPU which chambered fine as I noted earlier. I thought 198 was the standard service load but someone told me it was more like 170. Which was it? Any particular weight most people shoot out of their rifles of this era? I hope I'm not overloading it with 198.


The standard WW2 service round was 198 grains. The earlier M88 round was around 225 grains and a switch was made to the S patrone bullet around 1905 that was aprox. 153 grains. I don't recall if the heavier 198 grain started before/during WW1 or in the interwar years. You might find some special use rounds in different weights. Other countries also adopted somewhat different bullet weights as well. As I recall, the Czechs also had light and heavy ball 7.92 rounds in the 1930's, but don't remember the exact weights.
 
How in the hell did they get it so wrong..?

I mean c'mon...its 8-fukn-mm..how many ba-zillion rds of that have been made over the years.

And it doesnt sound like it was just a couple of boxes...seems like it was a lot...didnt anybody @ the plant try to chamber an occaisional round in a spec jig..?

WTF...?

I was thinking the same thing. The Romanians made good 8mm ammo for their military (at least none of the rounds I have shot either failed to chamber, failed to fire or failed to eject) but got it so wrong trying to make some commercially for sale? Did somebody take measurements of a spent case and decide that was the spec?
Does anybody know what the gun laws are like in Romania? I'm just wondering if they sell it in country and if so how they manage with complaints. Or is this just purely an export of theirs?
 
Blame the im,porter!

Blame the importers for not doing quality control lot inspections at time of purchase. And then verifying QC when the ammo arrives off the boat and is released from US customs here in the US.

Any licensed ammo importer into the US worth his salt is going to insure quality control... or risk many lawsuits! And the only way that ammo got into the US was through an ammo importer.

The importers KNOW what they are buying as it is in the contract agreement, whether it is new manufacture, surplus MILSPEC (to which MILSPEC standard?), or "scrap" ammo that is only to be sold for components.

What the initial importer says / sells to the distributors who then take possession of the ammo in the US is a different story!

But remember, if it is surplus (out of date or out of spec or not kept in proper storage) from a foreign govt./military... that foreign military got rid of it for a reason.

Example:

Years ago, Century International brought a large quantity of Israeli IMI 9mm ammo into the US. The "surplus" ammo was stored out in the desert sun... and rain... and cold... and then was acid washed to remove the tarnish on the brass, or some was tumbled in some media to remove the tarnish/corrosion.
Century sent out letters to the distributors telling them to get the ammo back from customers because the powder in the ammo was changed (and the brass weakened) due to the environmental exposure and to the "cleaning" (a number of firearms were damaged when using that ammo!) They ended up re-imbursing all of us dealers/distributors and made us sign wavers say that we would break-down the ammo for the components.

I could go on and on about certain lots of bad (British, Indian, Israeli, Czech, Canadian) "surplus" ammo over the years...
 
When you say "hard stop" does that mean that the bolt will slide home but you cannot rotate/lock the bolt handle?

Do you have any other 8mm ammo that you could try?

Second the motion: The Romanian surplus I've tried has been reliable though not particularly accurate nor clean.

If a rifle is a dead mint collectible, then by all means I won't shoot it. If it's merely really nice, I will shoot it. Firing of and by itself should not harm any well designed, well made firearm. This notion that you somehow have to "save" the gun only means that you pass a nice gun along to someone else after you're gone or when you sell it, without having enjoyed it to the maximum.

Laminated WWII German wooden stocks with dark or reddish colored glue are among the strongest ever made, because of the beech wood and resorcinol glue used. Unless the stock is obviously damaged or has been soaked in water or oil, you won't harm it by handling or use. The glue actually got stronger with age, as is its nature.
 
Yes, it was a failure on more than one level with the QC. The bad ammo was head stamped SADU 13 (2013?) on the stuff I received. I compared one of the rounds of the new 170 gr. bad ammo to a Romanian 1970's surplus round (head stamp 22 73) and the overall length is shorter on the bad ammo. I thought the Romanian surplus was also 170 gr. as I recall. Did they seat the bullet too deep and deform the neck slightly?

Photos below show 1970's surplus(left) and the "new" commercial stuff.
 

Attachments

  • P1060191.jpg
    P1060191.jpg
    203.5 KB · Views: 26
  • P1060189.JPG
    P1060189.JPG
    207.8 KB · Views: 28
When you say "hard stop" does that mean that the bolt will slide home but you cannot rotate/lock the bolt handle?

Do you have any other 8mm ammo that you could try?

Second the motion: The Romanian surplus I've tried has been reliable though not particularly accurate nor clean.

If a rifle is a dead mint collectible, then by all means I won't shoot it. If it's merely really nice, I will shoot it. Firing of and by itself should not harm any well designed, well made firearm. This notion that you somehow have to "save" the gun only means that you pass a nice gun along to someone else after you're gone or when you sell it, without having enjoyed it to the maximum.

Laminated WWII German wooden stocks with dark or reddish colored glue are among the strongest ever made, because of the beech wood and resorcinol glue used. Unless the stock is obviously damaged or has been soaked in water or oil, you won't harm it by handling or use. The glue actually got stronger with age, as is its nature.

yes, the bolt would not rotate past about 2 o'clock. Tried different ammo and all is well. Shot it today, cleaned it and put it up. Agreed on your note about enjoying your guns. I think about any gun made in the 1900's should be shootable if that is what you decide to do. I have some CW and pre-1900 lever actions I won't shoot just because I don't want to tear them down to clean them. I like the old dirt in the crevices!
 
When you say "hard stop" does that mean that the bolt will slide home but you cannot rotate/lock the bolt handle?

Do you have any other 8mm ammo that you could try?

Second the motion: The Romanian surplus I've tried has been reliable though not particularly accurate nor clean.

If a rifle is a dead mint collectible, then by all means I won't shoot it. If it's merely really nice, I will shoot it. Firing of and by itself should not harm any well designed, well made firearm. This notion that you somehow have to "save" the gun only means that you pass a nice gun along to someone else after you're gone or when you sell it, without having enjoyed it to the maximum.

Laminated WWII German wooden stocks with dark or reddish colored glue are among the strongest ever made, because of the beech wood and resorcinol glue used. Unless the stock is obviously damaged or has been soaked in water or oil, you won't harm it by handling or use. The glue actually got stronger with age, as is its nature.

The standard WW2 service round was 198 grains. The earlier M88 round was around 225 grains and a switch was made to the S patrone bullet around 1905 that was aprox. 153 grains. I don't recall if the heavier 198 grain started before/during WW1 or in the interwar years. You might find some special use rounds in different weights. Other countries also adopted somewhat different bullet weights as well. As I recall, the Czechs also had light and heavy ball 7.92 rounds in the 1930's, but don't remember the exact weights.

thanks! I thought I read somewhere that it was 198 grains.
 
So now we have fair warning not to buy this ammo from Sportsman's supply or anywhere else. Wonder how many complaints they've gotten and what they've done about it.
 
No need to worry about overloading with commercial PPU...that is some very anemic ammo.

Barely breaks 2K fps...and sometimes not...has about 6-8" of drop @ 100 yds compared t M75.

Good brass though..great for reloading.

Agree! I was shooting a Gew 98 with the PPU ammo at 100 yards. With a six-o'clock hold on the black bullseye and the minimum sight setting of 400 meters on the rifle, the first round (somewhat to my surprise) was dead center on the bullseye! I have to set my K98k sights at about 300-400 meters to shoot this stuff at 100 yards to get close to the bullseye.
 
No need to worry about overloading with commercial PPU...that is some very anemic ammo.

Barely breaks 2K fps...and sometimes not...has about 6-8" of drop @ 100 yds compared t M75.

Good brass though..great for reloading.

that's tremendous drop for 100 yards. I took mine out to just to check it out while I was cutting wood so I did not take targets, sandbags, etc. I was off-hand shooting at a cement block at about 100 yards and finally hit it after moving the sight up to over 200 yards/meters. There's my answer! thanks. Something occurred to me on these---there is no windage adjustment. I don't adjust for windage per se but I guess you have to assume that the front and rear sights are exactly where they are supposed to be. Maybe your adjustment is in the front post only?
 
if the rifle is as nice and original as c mountain says i wish he would not shoot it, but its his rifle. I hate reading posts where some guy had!!!!!!! to take granddad luger to the range cause he just had to shoot it. he had too mind you and was not concerned when it got scratched up by the staples and the shooting bench or the p-38 that had the slide separate etc.

six pages and MY 66 coupe had the answer all along
 
if the rifle is as nice and original as c mountain says i wish he would not shoot it, but its his rifle. I hate reading posts where some guy had!!!!!!! to take granddad luger to the range cause he just had to shoot it. he had too mind you and was not concerned when it got scratched up by the staples and the shooting bench or the p-38 that had the slide separate etc.

six pages and MY 66 coupe had the answer all along

Hi Sprat. Points well taken. After I shot it (15 times) I cleaned it very thoroughly just in case I don't shoot it again or it is a very long time until I do. Btw - I have a pristine p38 I bought from a friend of mine whose father brought it back and I did the same thing - shot it about 20 times and put it away. I am a collector first and foremost and buy guns from the eras in which I am interested. I shoot almost exclusively bullseye .22/.45
 
. I don't adjust for windage per se but I guess you have to assume that the front and rear sights are exactly where they are supposed to be. Maybe your adjustment is in the front post only?

Factory sighting is useally dead on.....as evidenced by a staked front sight.

I wouldnt be too concerned about shooting to the left or right until you are sandbagged up and very familiar with the gun and its trigger pull.

Doesnt take much of a flinch @ 1hundy to pull significantly left or right on the paper.

And even then ammo could be the issue....guns like what they like ...despite all things being equal.

(2) k98 byf 43 and (1) box of M75 ammo can/ will = drastically different results.

If you are not going to shoot it a lot I wouldnt worry about accuracy because it can take awhile to find a diet it likes.

Enjoy your new gun...congrats on what sounds like a great find.
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top