Third Party Press

BSW SS OBJECTIVE MOUNT SNIPER RIFLE

Here is a photo showing a SS Gew98 Objective Mount Sniper Rifle . This rifle has a Ziel Dialyt 4X with same Rings and Bases as the SS OM RIFLES .
I have a couple more photo that are similar to this one but are different SS Soldier with same type SS GEW98 OM Sniper Rifles I will post as soon as I locate them.

The photo on the right is another SS Gew98 OM Sniper Rifle . The Scope on this SS Gew98 OM Sniper is either Dialytan 4X or the Ziel Dialyt 6X

I believe I have one more SS GEW98 OM Sniper photo but I will need to dig deep to find it , if I find I will post it . Both these photos are already known books and not from my private collection .

Hello,
What book or publication is the right photo from?
 
Georg,
All good points you make. 1941 was a tough year for rifle production in general, I would find it hard to believe that ssr production entirely filled the need in this timeframe personally, but I also don’t know the scale of their production.

I don’t know serial ranges well, but I was told my Ziel-Dialyt 6x was roughly 1939/40 timeframe. I might have some catalogs or adds I can check as well. Catalogs are only so useful though, as often they would still offer older models even though they were no longer advertised. At least that’s the case with gun makers, maybe less true with optics.
 
A point is being missed here. The SS SSR production went to the SS depots and was generally held for “other than” the field deployed Waffen-SS (under control of the army). Waffen-SS weapon procurement was through the Army. You can’t conflate the 2 different issued weapons. Yes, some field Waffen-SS units used SS SSR rifles, but much less than you would expect after 41. Training units solely drew arms from SS depots. So by saying that not all of these 41 and later produced SS SSR rifles were not meant for Waffen-SS units, in fact I’d bet very few. This includes later SS double claws which have only shown up in 1 wartime photo of an ad box SS Volkssturm photo.
 
Georg,
All good points you make. 1941 was a tough year for rifle production in general, I would find it hard to believe that ssr production entirely filled the need in this timeframe personally, but I also don’t know the scale of their production.

I don’t know serial ranges well, but I was told my Ziel-Dialyt 6x was roughly 1939/40 timeframe. I might have some catalogs or adds I can check as well. Catalogs are only so useful though, as often they would still offer older models even though they were no longer advertised. At least that’s the case with gun makers, maybe less true with optics.
Georg
The time frame for Your Ziel-Dialyt is correct
 
If I remember correctly Hensoldt had the same serialization method as Zeiss, means they had one single serial block for all types of scope models they had. This allows to date the SS Dialytan scopes (62.XXX serials) pretty close to the SC (starting at 64.XXX) scopes. So if Dave's scope is 56.XXX it would pre-date the SS Dialytan SSR scopes with DH and runes. I'd therefore again vote with that the OM rifles predate the SSR rifles. The question though remains, how much?
 
Personally I think it’s a mistake to use the scope manufacture date to determine the assembly date. How many original prewar SS photos have you seen with OM snipers? Certainly you can produce at least 1.
 
Personally I think it’s a mistake to use the scope manufacture date to determine the assembly date. How many original prewar SS photos have you seen with OM snipers? Certainly you can produce at least 1.
Mike
Maybe 10 known original SS OM Sniper photos not more that I am aware of .
 
Here are 2 more Original Photo from my personal collection of SS OBJECTIVE MOUNT Rifles .
Photo on left shows a SS OM RIFLE with Dialytan 4X
Photo on right shows a SS OM Rifle with Ziel-Dialyt 6X and Mono Pod. I want to point out that the Scopes Front Ring has different placement than the than the known Objective Mount Type Scopes .
 

Attachments

  • WSS Sniper 1 DR 2.jpg
    WSS Sniper 1 DR 2.jpg
    79.9 KB · Views: 79
  • Objective Mount 6X - DR 1.jpg
    Objective Mount 6X - DR 1.jpg
    165.3 KB · Views: 78
Last edited:
I need to update - the document for Army supply to Waffen-SS units is Feb 1940. Also, the Sauer rifles I saw at the time I was writing that chapter were 1940 dated, not 41.
 

Attachments

  • 3A74C8BB-3DA6-405C-A565-BC93EC223228.jpeg
    3A74C8BB-3DA6-405C-A565-BC93EC223228.jpeg
    298.1 KB · Views: 23
Here are 2 more Original Photo from my personal collection of SS OBJECTIVE MOUNT Rifles .
Photo on left shows a SS OM RIFLE with Dialytan 4X
Photo on right shows a SS OM Rifle with Ziel-Dialyt 6X and Mono Pod. I want to point out that the Scopes Front Rings has different placement than the than the known Objective Mount Type Scopes .
Really great photos Dave. Thanks for posting. I would like to find out as much information on these rifles possible. Not much out there though. You have made progress here it seems. Not much posted about these rifles.
 
I need to update - the document for Army supply to Waffen-SS units is Feb 1940. Also, the Sauer rifles I saw at the time I was writing that chapter were 1940 dated, not 41.
Mike, was this order later rescinded? Why were special contract runs of weapons necessary at later dates for the SS?
 
Here are 2 more Original Photo from my personal collection of SS OBJECTIVE MOUNT Rifles .
Photo on left shows a SS OM RIFLE with Dialytan 4X
Photo on right shows a SS OM Rifle with Ziel-Dialyt 6X and Mono Pod. I want to point out that the Scopes Front Rings has different placement than the than the known Objective Mount Type Scopes .
Dave have any of these monopods ever turned up?
 
Mike, was this order later rescinded? Why were special contract runs of weapons necessary at later dates for the SS?
No, this was in force for the entirety of the war. You are under the impression that SS contract guns were for the Waffen SS - They we’re not. Either that or you are not understanding the difference between SS and Waffen SS.

Read the order - the SS was responsible for supplying weapons to the training units, SS Totenkopf units and SS Police units operating under NSDAP orders. Wehrmacht weapons were for Waffen SS units under command of the Army. If SS units were not under command of the Army they were not allowed access to weapons. The SS also used the Army depot repair system while in service of the Wehrmacht.

To bring the point back around, IMO these objective mount rifles were supplied by the army to the SS and the arming of the WaffenSS was why they came about. I wouldn’t put it past the army to scope Gew98m’s and supply them to the SS as well (as seen in Dave’s photo). By the way, the army wasn’t happy about arming the WaffenSS at a time they needed rifles for their own units.

One day documents will show up and end any speculation. They must exist….
 
Last edited:
Dave have any of these monopods ever turned up?
Not that I am aware of Rick . I would give my left leg for an all matching example SS OM Rifle with Mono Pod and Ziel-Dialyt 6X Scope like one in photo .
 
Really great photos Dave. Thanks for posting. I would like to find out as much information on these rifles possible. Not much out there though. You have made progress here it seems. Not much posted about these rifles.
I can certainly understand wanting as much knowledge as possible , I will only ask one thing in return if You find a SS OM with Mono & Ziel-Dialyt You have defer the rifle to me seeing how you obtained this knowledge by the info/photo that I posted . :oops: OK ??
 
No, this was in force for the entirety of the war. You are under the impression that SS contract guns were for the Waffen SS - They we’re not. Either that or you are not understanding the difference between SS and Waffen SS.

Read the order - the SS was responsible for supplying weapons to the training units, SS Totenkopf units and SS Police units operating under NSDAP orders. Wehrmacht weapons were for Waffen SS units under command of the Army. If SS units were not under command of the Army they were not allowed access to weapons. The SS also used the Army depot repair system while in service of the Wehrmacht.

To bring the point back around, IMO these objective mount rifles were supplied by the army to the SS and the arming of the WaffenSS was why they came about. I wouldn’t put it past the army to scope Gew98m’s and supply them to the SS as well (as seen in Dave’s photo). By the way, the army wasn’t happy about arming the WaffenSS at a time they needed rifles for their own units.

One day documents will show up and end any speculation. They must exist….
There was some confusion on my part as to where the SS contract weapons ended up. Many of the single rune guns look to have seen combat which would have been, I thought, the Waffen SS. I do understand the order more completely with your explanation.
 
I can certainly understand wanting as much knowledge as possible , I will only ask one thing in return if You find a SS OM with Mono & Ziel-Dialyt You have defer the rifle to me seeing how you obtained this knowledge by the info/photo that I posted . :oops: OK ??
That’s a tall request Dave. I’ve seen the monopod in photos and had not seen a photo where I could make out the 6X Scope. Now to find one for sale. Well that’s another story. Always looking. I think most of these probably ended up in Russia.

Later in the war the Waffen SS probably could get the same snipers as the Heer.
 
That’s a tall request Dave. I’ve seen the monopod in photos and had not seen a photo where I could make out the 6X Scope. Now to find one for sale. Well that’s another story. Always looking. I think most of these probably ended up in Russia.

Later in the war the Waffen SS probably could get the same snipers as the Heer.
For my personal understanding, If the Waffen SS was given all the same equipment as the Heer and were not given weapons from contract runs and depots, who was issued the double and single claw sniper rifles?
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top