Yikes ,splitting wood . I will take a pass.
I have been told that the Germans used Ballistol .
Any know negative effects ?
Old timers have mentioned oven cleaner for removing old grease and grime.
And Yes I do understand leave it the hell alone.
Just trying to sort out gun show talk.
I assume a pretty big reason is it stains the wood and leaves the stock in an unoriginal state
Yikes. Well I have a lightly sanded stock that i'm trying to match the hand guard to(the reddish tint). I thought raw linseed oil was good? Guess i got the wrong info. I've already put about 4 coats it. Should i do something else to protect it?
Linseed oil on stocks is a very touchy subject here. I see it slightly different than some others. I am in total agreement that if you get a stock that still has its original finish, has not been sanded etc. You don't need to do anything. When I get one like that, if it has surface dirt, I wipe it down with a slightly damp cotton rag, then rub it with a dry cotton cloth, and it is done. After that if you keep it in a humidity controlled enviroment, it should stay stable for your lifetime. When people say they have an extremely dry stock, it does not need oil, which seals moisture out, it just needs to be put in a properly conditioned enviroment, and over time it will absorb moisture from the air. If a stock has already been defaced by sanding, I don't think linseed oil is a bad thing to use. When I first joined an internet forum discussing K98ks many years ago, the experts were adamant that the Germans never used Linseed oil, that was just a US thing. More recent research, much of it done by very knowledgable folks on this forum, has brought to light original German wartime documents that they did use some form of Linseed oil, "linseed oil varnish" on pre war and early war stocks at least. I think the disagreements now are about exactly what "linseed oil varnish" consisted of, and does a similiar product exist today. Later war stocks may or may not have been stained and/or oiled depending on timeframe and maker.
If your stock was already sanded enough to remove the original finish, then I don't think you have hurt it if linseed oil has been lightly applied. I would think it more correct than a modern product like Howards feed-an-wax which some people approve of.
The above is my opinion only, and there are others on this forum who I have great respect for and extensive knowledge that will disagree, and I totally respect there opinion.
good luck
Runner,
I believe there are some diplomatic positions open in the state dept.
Interested ?
All good information and well delivered.
So I'll say this for the Howard's supporters of which I'm one. This has been said many times by many of us but we're talking drops.. a small dollop. Not like you're slattering on SPF 70 in the DR. A small amount in your palms rubbed and then rubbed in. And I've only used this on chemically cleaned/chemically dried stocks where someone when off with Acetone, Lacquer Thinner or some similar drying solvent. Also as previously stated and asserted I'd challenge most anyone to even tell what or anything was done after a day or 2. Serious. It's the 'well if a half ounce is good, half a bottle is better' guys who give it a bad name.
First off, it would be news to M1903 collectors that linseed oil was splitting their stocks. Second, there is raw linseed oil, which dries very slowly, and "boiled" linseed oil, which has a chemical in it to speed oxidation. The US military issued raw linseed oil for use on stocks through WW2.
I have an Amberg 1917, import marked out of Turkey. Not worth much as the last 6" of the barrel are rough. But it is mostly matching, including the stock, which is quite nice. Hardwood stock with some cured oil on it. Maybe the Turks did it, or maybe they just finished what someone else started.