Hi all. I would like an opinion from the experts about this frog. There is a mark on the back, but I can't interpret it.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Was thinking the same thing about the washers. In the first photo, I see washer on the lower left is missing. It is not unusual to see frogs exhibiting substantial field usage minus a washer (or rivet) as well. IMHO, it is more likely the original copper or brass rivets were inadequately peened, washers eventually popped off and field replaced w/alloy ones (which look about ready to go themselves).It could be too a B?37 depot location and date , strange is little the washers are alu? and rivets brass, but i would personally prefer not LW as normally in that time frame used a LBA and unit stamps on their frogs.
Copper & brass rivets/washers were used on military frogs during the inter-war years up to the mid-1930s. Then aluminum alloy rivets/washers primarily became the norm until superseded by steel... probably because aluminum (like the earlier copper/brass) were critical war materials reserved for more important uses. So, your frog appears to be from the latter 1930s and prior to the onset of WW2.Thank you very much pwcosol. ... In any case, I understand that you confirm it is a German war or pre-war frog. Right?
In reality the washer on the lower left is not missing. It's just the leather that's brokenWas thinking the same thing about the washers. In the first photo, I see washer on the lower left is missing. It is not unusual to see frogs exhibiting substantial field usage minus a washer (or rivet) as well. IMHO, it is more likely the original copper or brass rivets were inadequately peened, washers eventually popped off and field replaced w/alloy ones (which look about ready to go themselves).
Thank you very much pwcosol. A truly professional analysis. I too thought I was reading "L 37" (or 1937?)