Walnut Stock byf 42, 3452ii

Firebug90

Well-known member
A coworker of mine has this rifle and I know enough to know that walnut stocks weren't common by 1942 but not much else beyond that. We thought it might be a good idea to document the rifle and post it here to see if anyone knows anything more. Also curious as to the "3442" in the handguard. With the state of everything else on the rifle I'm inclined to believe it left the factory that way. No "H" on the right side of the stock, and no waffenamts on the right side of the receiver. No markings in the wood under the butt plate.

476324002_1669646887010915_3482544140579030071_n.jpg


472809342_609251598490004_6808333803223966138_n.jpg

475507558_1517415068937715_8059683592002104984_n.jpg

476339131_586359210884151_5166993900924344659_n.jpg

475318592_932509039086893_530440110400456722_n.jpg

475865954_1955487188190206_1673107906578318908_n.jpg

476193837_1682771429263155_8552242124366730071_n.jpg

474670129_1837070907041039_1987070495125994653_n.jpg


475468061_661247209626361_795174586145303224_n.jpg

475338053_1572271710830026_1839292446232247939_n.jpg

474840827_551950531335222_2012797822115167833_n.jpg

475295313_2637932359732461_7612990159803284366_n.jpg



475970625_955844949847047_5801585037129466496_n.jpg

475736748_1760685821443192_4836894365196163296_n.jpg

475838706_966725562093826_7652724372736192760_n.jpg
 
A most righteous byf42. Including the serial number in the handguard. Looks to be a factory error. 42 is a really interesting year in k98k production as they stopped using as many acceptances on a lot of the parts, but only for a period of time. This one having numerous FN subcontracted bolt parts is a neat bonus in my opinion.
 
A most righteous byf42. Including the serial number in the handguard. Looks to be a factory error. 42 is a really interesting year in k98k production as they stopped using as many acceptances on a lot of the parts, but only for a period of time. This one having numerous FN subcontracted bolt parts is a neat bonus in my opinion.
Agreed, the subcontractor FN parts along with the walnut stock and the rifle being a byf 42 is a awesome combo. Very nice and righteous example!
 
Looks great. You gotta love that walnut and those trademark Eagle stamps. They are so crisp. Here’s is one for reference. Agree that the handguard was a factory error.

 
I would agree with the others that the handguard is a factory error. That's a gorgeous byf 42, not many around and I love the walnut stock on this one. Would love to find one like it for my own collection, congrats on a wonderful '42!
 
Thanks a lot guys! Now he's going to read these comments and never sell it to me :D

Does anyone know the story on the continued use of walnut? Taking advantage of supply when they had it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jdt
Thanks a lot guys! Now he's going to read these comments and never sell it to me :D

Does anyone know the story on the continued use of walnut? Taking advantage of supply when they had it?
Pretty much, you see walnut quite a bit spread out and thru different manufacturers. One of our members (B.I.O) has a early war rifle with a matching, maple handguard. There is also the Elm stock variants seen on 43 BYF rifles
 
Thanks a lot guys! Now he's going to read these comments and never sell it to me :D

Does anyone know the story on the continued use of walnut? Taking advantage of supply when they had it?
Walnut was phased out slow in 1937 and the laminate was the preferred wood going forward. As the war progressed, they needed to use all wood avail. So there are sporadic uses of walnut throughout the production from MO.
Then also Elm was used also very briefly. We cherish the walnut for its ability to show off lovely War Eagles...lol :giggle:
 
Back
Top