Turd byf44

[Caesar1]

I’m not the best at finding bad numbers but the safety and shroud look bad, not sure about the body?

https://www.gunbroker.com/item/979503650

 

[PatickD]

100% sure this guy shill bids.

I am ok with the shield and bolt body. The safety is definitely a no from me.

 

[heavy_mech]

It's a clown show. However, based on some of his recent 'sales' I'm certain he could care less and is probably laughing every time he checks his bank account. Just the fact he started adding all those tags telling you how correct it is smacks of a joke. In the bizzarro world Gunbonker has become, the more strenuously they shout about how 'correct' it is, you can be certain the opposite is true.

 

[luftpirate]

Fine Turd Harvester is Back with another Classic

 

[Cav Trooper 19D]

Planting turds and harvesting stupid money. He's one of the usual suspects like uncommonwealth Arsenal

 

[hale1940]

I was justing look at this one GB. Safety is definetly no good. I'm confident this guy runs a humping factory out of his garage.

 

[Gerst]

Idiots don’t care. It looks nice and that’s all they care about. Where do these clowns get the money? From Biden, I guess. “This is no joke.”

 

[heavy_mech]

Without getting too specific, a few things just looked 'off' to me. Not willing to bet the farm on it but there are lots of documented examples to compare. I also think the 'ledge' on the bolt face looks low, exactly like material was removed. Just my $.02

 

[Bob in OHIO]

I asked the seller this morning if he knew the bolt was bogus...

 

[Jstealbird]

Definitely appears to be ground down a little bit

 

[Bob in OHIO]

$3225....+ tax

 

[Hambone]

I think the bolt is OK and the shroud probably. The safety and striker/sear, not so much. Check the pic sticky reference library, we have f block byf 44s in there.

 

[DaveDavis]

A poor hump job on bolt components