Yes he did , but he still insists that it is original . Even thought I pointed out multiple differences between an original Cad an a Spielauer repro Cad.
For learning purposes, can you point out some differences? I’m not sure I could pick out a spielauer fake without a welded up focal ring. I see no differences in the side by side dial pics posted
IMHO , first and foremost a collector needs to first learn how to spot an original scope and mount set . Second , you need to learn what the correct serial ranges for each type scope and what particular type of sniper rifle it is for . Scopes fall into specific serial ranges and that will tell you what platform they belong too . For example SSR , SS SSR , LT , HT and so on all these different types of Sniper rifles have certain types of scope that were used on each type sniper rifle and each type scope will have a certain serial range thats correct for the type of sniper rifle it used on .Dave - comsider writing a phamplet on spotting fakes plz
Dave, just checked a few Kahles scopes of mine, both military and commercial: the pairing number is present on all of them, even post WWII. Therefore it maybe should be put this way, the absence of this number is a possible indication of refinish, because especially on the ocular piece it is very lightly struck.A few different ways to tell if a Cad Scope is original or a Spielauer Reproduction Cad
1.The Tube and Rear Lens housing should have pairing numbers like in this photo below maybe a little tough to see the #924
Brian,This scope is without question an obvious reproduction for many reasons and would only fool someone who was new to collecting.
The CAD engrave looks post war most likely.Brian,
I'd be interested if you believe every part of this scope is not original, meaning do you even believe the cad was post WWII engraved to this scope tube? I concur with you on many parts, but I would not dare - without having it in hands - say the scope tube itself once was a welded commercial H/4x60 tube. So all I am saying is that some parts of this scope *could* be original. Of course this makes the whole listing problematic and happy that we address this here, all I'm looking to is to discuss with others if they also see something wrong with the tube that I cannot see.
GeorgDave, just checked a few Kahles scopes of mine, both military and commercial: the pairing number is present on all of them, even post WWII. Therefore it maybe should be put this way, the absence of this number is a possible indication of refinish, because especially on the ocular piece it is very lightly struck.
I have checked both H/4x60 as well as Heliavier as well as other Kahles scopes (the post WWII models with lateral adjustment), all have the pairing numbers, all also on ocular piece (because otherwise makes no sense, huh?), on some it is partially gone due to refinish, on others fully present. So I can confirm it was factory to ALL scopes of this period, doesn't matter if commercial or post war.Georg
The Scopes that you said have pairing #s are these scopes (Kahles Wien H/4X60) or (Kahles Wien Helaviers) like the example I posted pics of in my earlier post ??
Georg the Kahles Scope that You looked at did (ONLY the Tube have a number) or does the (Rear Lens Housing) have a matching/corresponding number also ????
I ask this because , I just did a image search for Kahles Wien Helavier and Kahles Wein H/4X60 a number of these images showed only the Tube had a number no number on rear lens housing and yes it showed the scope from many sides .
Of course he does. Actually EXACTLY what I expected.Yes he did , but he still insists that it is original . Even thought I pointed out multiple differences between an original Cad an a Spielauer repro Cad.
Georg. I have several CAD and Kahles Scopes and that is how it looks to me.I have checked both H/4x60 as well as Heliavier as well as other Kahles scopes (the post WWII models with lateral adjustment), all have the pairing numbers, all also on ocular piece (because otherwise makes no sense, huh?), on some it is partially gone due to refinish, on others fully present. So I can confirm it was factory to ALL scopes of this period, doesn't matter if commercial or post war.
Brian, thanks for the addendum of yours. Did you do a closeup font comparison too, or was this just your feeling?