Third Party Press

Sauer LSR 909ff CE Marked Receiver

Interesting variant. Is the tail end of the base numbered?

Edit - I see now it isn’t the normal type of base so it probably isn’t numbered. I’m guessing stock isn’t original? Different cut than normally seen (if you can call these normal).
 
Last edited:
have to agree.. Id say the original stock was lost. Ive had two in hand Larry O'conner is a member here he has one. Not in the best of shape but real.. Saw it in hand @ sos 2010-12 ? cant recall the year. At this point JPS was still notching only the inside of the wood like on a SSR. but these are so scarce just having one in any way shape or form is a feat for anyone..
If you look close the cut out is a bit sloppier than a factory LSR. Id still be happy to own it !! congrats..
 
That is a hard to find Barreled Receiver sadly thought the Base is not the correct for this variant and also the Stock Cutout is not correct for this variant

Here is a photo of a completely matching rifle which is only 4 rifles earlier than the barreled action Brian posted .

I am also posting a link to another later CE44 that was posted here awhile back .
https://www.k98kforum.com/threads/ce-44-lsr-sniper-gunshow-find.39971/
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0364.jpg
    IMG_0364.jpg
    104.3 KB · Views: 108
Stock is an original Menzel C marked stock for Gustloff LSR with checkered Butt Plate. It's an original LSR base on there I added. No number except hard to read WaA on front face as normal. Base fit with no alterations. Information is lacking on these early bases. I've heard rumors the bottom of base should be beveled for early Sauer LSR and marked Sauer WaA 37 instead Walther WaA 359. Those WaA are hard to read and often times could be confused by collectors to be a different number. If there are written records the bases were made at Sauer or HWZ for example for Sauer instead of Walther then I am not aware of this information? I think it is likely guy who assembled these may have added bevel at Sauer onto the normal looking mount. If this is the difference mentioned above? Most of the examples early Sauer LSR Receivers I have seen are not drilled. That is what makes this one different. The 3 hole gun in another thread with heat marks looks post war to me personally (If anyone remembers that discussion).

My focus was the Sniper receiver with hand stamped 909 on receiver and WaA 37 on receiver like Sauer turrets. I assumed if and when there would be replies then this discussion would occur. Stock and rest are not present, except the matching trigger guard.

Great to know the added information. It adds to base level of information and why I shared this information I posted. Side views of these are lacking and I did not get to see the Sauer LSR at SOS discussed above. So much unknown information on these.

Edit: Its hard to remember every thread. The link is posted above. Maybe the heat marked LSR Sauer was possibly real. It has the bevel and number at bottom. The heat marks are weird though and obviously add an element of doubt. That would be quite a coincidence though if not real due to that scope rail. Where is anyone likely to match those two things together (Sauer LSR rifle and rail).

IMG_2609.JPG
 
Last edited:
These images are from our database...this is all we have.
As you can see the base is numbered to the gun.
SN is 118ff.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2480.JPG
    DSCN2480.JPG
    70.4 KB · Views: 87
  • DSCN2481.JPG
    DSCN2481.JPG
    57.4 KB · Views: 83
  • DSCN2482.JPG
    DSCN2482.JPG
    67.7 KB · Views: 83
  • DSCN2483.JPG
    DSCN2483.JPG
    59.3 KB · Views: 93
  • DSCN2484.JPG
    DSCN2484.JPG
    54.6 KB · Views: 93
  • DSCN2485.JPG
    DSCN2485.JPG
    58.1 KB · Views: 93
  • jpslsr2.jpg
    jpslsr2.jpg
    70.1 KB · Views: 99
  • jpslsr4.jpg
    jpslsr4.jpg
    59.5 KB · Views: 94
  • jpslsr5.jpg
    jpslsr5.jpg
    65.2 KB · Views: 94
  • jpslsr7.jpg
    jpslsr7.jpg
    48.9 KB · Views: 92
That's a pretty crude looking rail. I can see a lot of difference there on that one from the Walther rail.
 
Here is a pic of the Base from the Rifle in the linked thread , its number to rifle same as other known originals in data base , if You notice the stock inletting is the same on these variants stock have a small inletting channel rather than a cut out .
 

Attachments

  • LSR Base .jpeg
    LSR Base .jpeg
    71 KB · Views: 82
  • Stock Inletting .jpeg
    Stock Inletting .jpeg
    206 KB · Views: 81
Yes. Will be on the look out for a Sauer Rail with serial, bevel, and odd style. I wonder if at some point in the early CE LSR sequence Sauer dropped the Sauer Rail and transitioned to the standard WaA 359 Walther mount. My friend has a Sauer Stock I am going to get and notch like the above one for display purposes until I can find a more complete rifle maybe someday.

Never seen a scope and mount numbered for an early Sauer Rifle. All the scopes and mounts I have as well as the ones I have recorded are the late war Sauer serial number sequence.
 
Very interesting to see. I was not aware that there were a few examples of this variant known to exist.

I wonder why these got the e/37 as well as turrets yet normal LSR production did not. Numbering the barrel makes sense.

Thanks for sharing.
 
we can only assume its a transition piece. Treated the same way as the HT's proofed in the sniper shop built along side the HT's. The later Lsr's this practice was obviously phased out..
Interesting both are ff suffix which makes perfect sense.. Also interesting is the Erma/Fiema developed the thick wall lsr dedicated receiver then it was handed off to astra werke as receiver production was slowed or haulted there.. Overall a super scarce variant..
 
Guys…I own 118ff.
I can get some more photos if you like.
There are photos of it in Senich’s book too.
I would also like to see pics of the Mount also if You don't mind because the owner of the rifle that I showed the one photo of told me that a typical LSR Mount will not fit on his rifles base . Does the mount on your rifle match the rifle ?? .
 
Here are more photos 905ff. Posted with permission of owner. He said a Walther mounted scope does not fit on this rail. So, there must be an early series Sauer mounted scope somewhere. Would fit loose as Walther mounted scope too small.

Edit: Already posted Walther mounted scope does not fit Sauer rail. Did not see.
IMG_0370.jpegIMG_0369.jpegIMG_0367.jpegIMG_0366.jpegIMG_0366.jpegIMG_0365.jpegIMG_0364.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Guys…I own 118ff.
I can get some more photos if you like.
There are photos of it in Senich’s book too.

I found pic of Your LSR in both 1st edition its on Pg 156 & 2nd edition its on Pg 256 of Senich`s Book . There is also another LSR on Pg 441 and description in book says base with single screw and 2 pins and the pics I posted here is of another such early/prototype LSR likely earlier variants than LSR 905ff and 909ff IMHO . Neither I or Mike Steves was ever able to get pics of stock and hand guard serial to verify if the stock matches receiver , but I suspect it does not , given theres no eagle H proof and the base cutout is not like cutouts on 118ff , 905ff or 1451c
 

Attachments

  • S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 118.jpg
    S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 118.jpg
    233.2 KB · Views: 59
  • S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 125.jpg
    S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 125.jpg
    231.2 KB · Views: 56
  • S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 119.jpg
    S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 119.jpg
    225 KB · Views: 53
  • S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 121.jpg
    S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 121.jpg
    223.7 KB · Views: 47
  • S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 129.jpg
    S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 129.jpg
    185.2 KB · Views: 50
  • S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 127.jpg
    S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 127.jpg
    216.6 KB · Views: 49
  • S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 131.jpg
    S42KSVWMN Chinese401942 131.jpg
    199 KB · Views: 56
Last edited:
Hey Dave-
Sorry for the delay..I’ve been out.
The mount, I believe/suspect, for 118ff is a repro so I’m not sure. It isn’t numbered but there is a waffenampt. It fits like a glove and this is my “shooter” example.
The rifle has a matching bolt, trigger guard and floor plate but the barrel bands are not matching.
The stock is an even bigger mess…it’s unmarked on the outside and inside the original numbers have been penciled out and 118 has been penciled in…it’s also so sanded and has a smooth butt plate ( which probably is correct for this variant).
The scope is a Hendsoldt single post reticle.
 

Attachments

  • 05984CA7-F2E5-4F57-8567-C1A4F91FC0FB.jpeg
    05984CA7-F2E5-4F57-8567-C1A4F91FC0FB.jpeg
    44.3 KB · Views: 66
  • 6E25CCAB-48D2-43E2-AADB-09A466D367AC.jpeg
    6E25CCAB-48D2-43E2-AADB-09A466D367AC.jpeg
    27.9 KB · Views: 60
  • C6C34D9F-D0E9-4A5C-AA68-78C58FB2572B.jpeg
    C6C34D9F-D0E9-4A5C-AA68-78C58FB2572B.jpeg
    32.4 KB · Views: 61
  • A0C9AECF-4A28-4A94-B64A-8E8A2B123D64.jpeg
    A0C9AECF-4A28-4A94-B64A-8E8A2B123D64.jpeg
    24.4 KB · Views: 65
I put my barrel and receiver in a Sauer Made stock I cut posted above. New Photos added above.

I am going to try this mount below on a friends rifle who has the whole CE 43 marked LSR except the scope and mount. Any opinions on mount? Will be fitted in a couple weeks. If it fits then I'm sure a deal will be made if he wants it. It's marked like a 1944 X Block Mount and most of these drilled guns I have seen so far are ff letter block. Maybe it's for a CE marked LSR receiver that got used in X block. Maybe for a X Block 1943 or 1944. Well it's an unknown and I don't think there are any others to make a comparison that I know of.

It has been milled on the inside edge to clear the receiver. Like I would expect a real one to be like for CE Marker Receiver Sauer Rail. I have had this mount in my collection for several years and just dug it out. See photos. Maybe it will fit?



IMG_5781.jpgIMG_5782.jpgIMG_5783.jpg
 
Last edited:

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top