Third Party Press

"S" marking on K98 parts

M1903A3

Keeper of the Def's Head
Hi everyone!

Someone had mentioned in another thread having seen a small "s" stamped on K98 parts and I replied that I thought I recalled seeing that somewhere too. Well I dug through my stuff and here's what I found. Thoughts??
9b38066256081f44cf6e04a523e115c7.jpg
 
"S" marking on K98 parts

More pics. These are out of an RC bolt assembly that I picked up which was the entire back half minus the body and extractor. The Russians did a half way job on this bolt, missing grinding off a bunch of markings and not electro-pencilling all of the pieces either. Note that the firing pin serial got scrubbed but not the WaA or the "s". Also note the "v" on the barrel of the firing pin, and the remains of a WaA on the safety.
cfcfabd39412f6fc87437c13686e9ae1.jpg
1a94b8d7dd2f45b3bff0f2d7e49f3b9d.jpg
38c12b36dc5f1ab8f8d18ccfcdc1d576.jpg
21ddbcb2f6dc233377f15601167bc5ce.jpg
209c6dddf6f05c0b0c565c851a5b3217.jpg
dea04559fbf9740591b2412ddfdfd724.jpg
 
Last edited:
"S" marking on K98 parts

They also electro-pencilled the side of the cocking piece but left the "e" (Kohler) and the 4 digit serial on the back.
 
Last edited:
Bump. Anyone?? Hambone? Farb? Loewe?? I don't have Volume I so this "s" might be common knowledge. Like I said someone else saw them on a part too.
 
Cocking piece is an RC, and the e marking is typical for parts made by Hermann Köhler, mostly used on bcd's.

As to the S markings, nobody knows for sure, but I can tell you that the majority of pre-war armorers parts have S markings. I personally think it's a holdover to the time when Simson was the only firm allowed to make spare components, and was continued even after it was unneeded (much like S/ code 98k manufacturers markings). I feel the S was meant to imply Simson, since they were allowed to make rifles as well (see S marked 98b's) in post WW1 Germany. These small S markings disappear around the same time S/ codes disappear.

It's all just theories as there really isn't a reason given in the surviving documents as to WHY the S/ codes were introduced.
 
Thanks Farb, very very interesting!!! Yeah I knew the other marks that the Russians didn't scrub but I hadn't ever seen an explanation for the "s" marking. Plus if that's in the first of your books for the early K98's I don't have a copy of that (yet) so I would have missed out.

Thanks for the info Farb!!! I too love the unexplained mysteries in K98's.
 
Here's a couple pics of my bolt with a couple S marks.

They also electro-pencilled the side of the cocking piece but left the "e" (Kohler) and the 4 digit serial on the back.

Mine has a lot of Imperial proofs with Waf amt 214.
 

Attachments

  • DSC02914.jpg
    DSC02914.jpg
    257.7 KB · Views: 26
  • DSC02912.jpg
    DSC02912.jpg
    259.4 KB · Views: 24
  • DSC02930.jpg
    DSC02930.jpg
    262.3 KB · Views: 18
  • DSC02964.jpg
    DSC02964.jpg
    301.8 KB · Views: 27
Waffenamt and the letter S

Mine has a lot of Imperial proofs with Waf amt 214.

The S kind of looks like an Imperial S but then again it looks like a modern S with a slash through it to me. Imperial S's were more script looking weren't they?
This is my OPINION, The S was slashed by inspector 214 after he inspected the older parts and approved them for active service in the German army.
 
Last edited:
The S kind of looks like an Imperial S but then again it looks like a modern S with a slash through it to me. Imperial S's were more script looking weren't they?
This is my OPINION, The S was slashed by inspector 214 after he inspected the older parts and approved them for active service in the German army.

Yeah I think you're probably right, I've never seen it on another before. Here's what I think is a script S under my receiver, could be a g I dunno. I figured on a thin piece such as ejector that a full script S would be to hard to do so they used a basic form? A few of my bolt parts are 214 stamped with a plain S only the ejector has the slash through it, some parts have imperial proofs only. Mr Farbs n some other bloke have said it's an armoury bolt. Note the 1 (I think) on rear of sightleaf and on back of cocking piece.
 

Attachments

  • DSC02754.jpg
    DSC02754.jpg
    327.7 KB · Views: 11
  • DSC02755.jpg
    DSC02755.jpg
    329.2 KB · Views: 10
  • DSC02766.jpg
    DSC02766.jpg
    286.9 KB · Views: 11
  • DSC02971.jpg
    DSC02971.jpg
    286.5 KB · Views: 8
  • DSC02915.jpg
    DSC02915.jpg
    265 KB · Views: 10
The S kind of looks like an Imperial S but then again it looks like a modern S with a slash through it to me. Imperial S's were more script looking weren't they?
This is my OPINION, The S was slashed by inspector 214 after he inspected the older parts and approved them for active service in the German army.

Although looking at it again the s has quite a slant on it. Not like the S on firing pin and under cocking piece.
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top