Third Party Press

Polish 91/98/25?

Nice, congratulations!
These are painfully difficult to find, especially matching and all intact. Does your's have a one or two piece ejector? That's the difference between a /25 and a /26.

Take the time to look it over for additional numbered components. Mine is all matching and it seems like every single part is numbered. They didn't spare any effort on these.

Congratulations!
Pat
 
Very nice and very hard to come by.

The handguard is missing, which is disappointing, but it's not that uncommon with these.
 
Pat said:
Nice, congratulations!
These are painfully difficult to find, especially matching and all intact. Does your's have a one or two piece ejector? That's the difference between a /25 and a /26.

Take the time to look it over for additional numbered components. Mine is all matching and it seems like every single part is numbered. They didn't spare any effort on these.

Congratulations!
Pat
Click to expand...
Thank you Pat
It does seem to be matching, here’s a photo of the ejector ?IMG_4215.jpeg
 
Congrats on finding a rare and desirable rifle!

I posted some photos in this thread of this rifle in use:

www.gunboards.com

Polish 91/91/25 Restoration

Bought it years ago, matching but the stock totally chopped. Finally got it put back together. M-91 stock that I picked up at a show, Looks like a typical Romanian import and that's when I got it. Gew 98 Lower band squeezed in a vise until it was round, Gew 98 Front band, bayonet lug. Used a...
www.gunboards.com www.gunboards.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pat
Schoolbd,
It appears you have a 91/98/25. Nothing at all wrong with that, it is one of the iterations of this type, which was changed to a two-piece ejector in the 91/98/26/.

I like your idea of fabricating a hand guard for this. That's exactly what the Poles did out of captured Bolshevik M91 hand guards, and is exactly what would fit on these carbines. I say go for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top