Third Party Press

Matching BYF 45 Kriegsmodell

Thought you guys might like this one, my matching BYF 45 Kriegsmodell.

Obviously you can really notice the late war features on this one. Chatter marks on the stock, no cleaning rod or bayonet lug and the welded & screwed in place front and rear barrel band.
 

Attachments

  • 20240922_120316.jpg
    20240922_120316.jpg
    75.7 KB · Views: 142
  • 20240922_120222.jpg
    20240922_120222.jpg
    131.5 KB · Views: 144
  • 20240922_120335.jpg
    20240922_120335.jpg
    93.1 KB · Views: 144
  • 20241104_174947.jpg
    20241104_174947.jpg
    132.7 KB · Views: 143
  • 20241104_175005.jpg
    20241104_175005.jpg
    78 KB · Views: 144
Unless it’s the lighting, looks like this rifle’s stock took a heavy dose of modern BLO a few years back….

Thanks for sharing. Can we get some more close ups of the stock chatter?
 
Unless it’s the lighting, looks like this rifle’s stock took a heavy dose of modern BLO a few years back….

Thanks for sharing. Can we get some more close ups of the stock chatter?
I took these photos in my dark laundry so that probably explains it. The stock is solid walnut and there is no signs of sanding. I'll try and get some more close ups of the chatter marks on the stock. I bought this rifle from a reputable source so I'm pretty confident he would've mentioned something pretty significant as a BLO coat on the stock. I've posted this in several forums and you seem to be the only one to suggest this. Obviously not having a dig at you. Just curious if there is any other indication it might have had a coat of BLO over it?
 
Last edited:
I mean, the stock literally looks black in the photos. As far as “several forums”, 90% of top k98k experts live here on this forum. Many exclusively just on this forum. For example, some forums to this day still have senior members who believe a Mitchell’s Mauser with its certificate is an original all matching k98k. I wish I was joking, but I’m not.

Again, if the lack of lighting is misrepresenting the appearance of the stock pics… Could you please take some new ones? The right side of the buttstock should have an Eagle/H if it truly wasn’t sanded. Walnut stocks usually retain the markings really well unless messed with.

The reason I suggest modern BLO may have been used is based solely on the very dark appearance of the stock. Modern BLO is an incorrect finish. The Germans never used it, but many, many years ago a rumor began due to some bad information and the practice began. This led to countless people slathering their stocks with local hardware store BLO and subsequently due to the driers, accelerants, etc… it tended to really darken the stock in time, sometimes almost turning it very dark brown/black.

Below is a link to a A block very close to yours in a laminate stock.


One in walnut…

 
I mean, the stock literally looks black in the photos. As far as “several forums”, 90% of top k98k experts live here on this forum. Many exclusively just on this forum. For example, some forums to this day still have senior members who believe a Mitchell’s Mauser with its certificate is an original all matching k98k. I wish I was joking, but I’m not.

Again, if the lack of lighting is misrepresenting the appearance of the stock pics… Could you please take some new ones? The right side of the buttstock should have an Eagle/H if it truly wasn’t sanded. Walnut stocks usually retain the markings really well unless messed with.

The reason I suggest modern BLO may have been used is based solely on the very dark appearance of the stock. Modern BLO is an incorrect finish. The Germans never used it, but many, many years ago a rumor began due to some bad information and the practice began. This led to countless people slathering their stocks with local hardware store BLO and subsequently due to the driers, accelerants, etc… it tended to really darken the stock in time, sometimes almost turning it very dark brown/black.

Below is a link to a A block very close to yours in a laminate stock.


One in walnut…

Hey man, thanks for the insight. I did quickly take it out into sunlight before I went to work and it did look a lighter compared to the photos I posted. I'll double check when I finish up and send through some more photos.
 
Hey man, thanks for the insight. I did quickly take it out into sunlight before I went to work and it did look a lighter compared to the photos I posted. I'll double check when I finish up and send through some more photos.
Sorry for the delay here are some more photos. I contacted Mike Steves who runs the latewar.com website to get his insight on it. So the stock has not been sanded but yes, has seen a lot of oil which explains the dark appearance of the wood and the absence of proof marks. Whether this was done with baked Linseed oil postwar or not is debatable. Essentially no real way of telling if it 100% was or not.

I got in contact with the seller who I bought it from and he said when he purchased 2 of them they both came in wrapped paper that was coated with oil which might explain the appearance of the stock. I'm still happy with the rifle as everything else is correct & genuine for a full Kriegsmodell rifle besides the stock being heavily coated in oil which I'm happy to leave as is. These rifles are still pretty hard to come by, especially here in Australia where the market isn't as expansive. In the end it's a good start to my byf collection & I'm glad I have it in my possession.
 

Attachments

  • 20241107_073243.jpg
    20241107_073243.jpg
    229.9 KB · Views: 61
  • 20241107_073233.jpg
    20241107_073233.jpg
    239.2 KB · Views: 61
  • 20241107_073300.jpg
    20241107_073300.jpg
    194 KB · Views: 59
  • 20241107_073249.jpg
    20241107_073249.jpg
    134.1 KB · Views: 58
  • 20241107_073319.jpg
    20241107_073319.jpg
    152.5 KB · Views: 58
  • 20241107_073327.jpg
    20241107_073327.jpg
    228.8 KB · Views: 61

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top