No, not at all.I certainly do not have all of the answers either and I hope that I did not come across that way.
Another possibility is that these are very, very late production. Most of the officers of the BAL above the rank of Leutnant seem to have been fired or reassigned around November/December 1944. Perhaps the inspectors were simply no longer there, or they didn't have stamps ready for the new officers who replaced them.Excellent info and discussion. I had always thought that the W and S variants were non-Luft contract. It appears now they are later inspects of the L5 and L6, and those must be parallel production.
Another possibility is that these are very, very late production. Most of the officers of the BAL above the rank of Leutnant seem to have been fired or reassigned around November/December 1944. Perhaps the inspectors were simply no longer there, or they didn't have stamps ready for the new officers who replaced them.
I pretty much agree with your original thought on these and the opinion put forth in one of the detailed posts above. The S and the W were likely inspector or acceptance marks for these knives contracted by non LW entities. We know for sure that some of these knives were field tested by certain Heer units later war along with gravity knives. We also know that some limited issues of gravity knives were made to certain W-SS units. We also know that by 1942/43 only two makers of gravity knives existed and those were SMF and Weyersberg. Some (very few) type II gravity knifes are also marked S and l no LW acceptance and are always SMF RBNr so IMO the S is hard associated with SMF and these are probably Heer and or W-SS contracted pieces. I fully believe the same applies to the these knives S for Heer (and or W-SS procurement) and W for Weyersberg, the two makersExcellent info and discussion. I had always thought that the W and S variants were non-Luft contract. It appears now they are later inspects of the L5 and L6, and those must be parallel production.
I pretty much agree with your original thought on these and the opinion put forth in one of the detailed posts above. The S and the W were likely inspector or acceptance marks for these knives contracted by non LW entities. We know for sure that some of these knives were field tested by certain Heer units later war along with gravity knives. We also know that some limited issues of gravity knives were made to certain W-SS units. We also know that by 1942/43 only two makers of gravity knives existed and those were SMF and Weyersberg. Some (very few) type II gravity knifes are also marked S and l no LW acceptance and are always SMF RBNr so IMO the S is hard associated with SMF and these are probably Heer and or W-SS contracted pieces. I fully believe the same applies to the these knives S for Heer (and or W-SS procurement) and W for Weyersberg, the two makers
I certainly have never seen that information (LW suspended acceptance and it marks of such) but base most of my comments on the fighting knife S and W marks on Brunners excellent research in his book on the gravity knife. It is well documented in that book that specially selected army units field tested and got limited issues of both the gravity knife and the or a close combat knife. The timeframe of these trials correspond to when these knives so marked (w or s) would have been made. It seems 99% likely that SMF and Weyersberg were the two and probably only two makers. I think all army (and any SS) procurement of gravity knives were from SMF only and no W marked gravity knives are known, only S marked, maker logo with LW eagle number, RBNr with and without LW eagle number. Those RBNr without eagle or S are very rare but may also represent a knife that went somewhere other than LW.You guys here know more than me about edged weapons, particularly Slash. I defer. My thoughts were simply based upon my observations and ideas. I did not know that the Luft./LZA suspended use of that inspection, so that was the best I could come up with. Do we know that LZA5 and LZA6 suspended inspection markings?
Well, the BAL probably didn't suspended inspections in most places, but something very serious happened in the BAL in December 1944.I did not know that the Luft./LZA suspended use of that inspection, so that was the best I could come up with. Do we know that LZA5 and LZA6 suspended inspection markings?
And about this, I personnaly never noticed, but my RBNr/Luftampt5 has the cross variant of scabbard so the type of scabbard probably wasn't issued with great accuracy ( or the soldiers exchanged / lost one and got a new one who knows )Has anyone here noticed that :
W/BAL 5 knives very often got this kind of scabbard (dots):
View attachment 344393
S/BAL 6 knives very often got this kind of scabbard (crosses):
View attachment 344395
This is just a theory, based on observations. So not verified.And about this, I personnaly never noticed, but my RBNr/Luftampt5 has the cross variant of scabbard so the type of scabbard probably wasn't issued with great accuracy ( or the soldiers exchanged / lost one and got a new one who knows )
Sure, but now that you've mentionned it, I admit there seems to be some kind of patern there.. Sure, I will post it here as I already made some posts about it on other forums, but I learned more on it since thenThis is just a theory, based on observations. So not verified.
I did not know that some of these knives had RBNr. Will you please make a post to show us your knife ?
Here it is ( the images are to big for the forum so i used links instead ) :This is just a theory, based on observations. So not verified.
I did not know that some of these knives had RBNr. Will you please make a post to show us your knife ?
Thank you Sir. If you don't mind, I've resized two pics and uploaded them here so that they remain on the forum :Here it is ( the images are to big for the forum so i used links instead ) :
![]()
Visionneuse images - Noelshack - https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2023/21/2/1684871060-img-3435.jpg
Vous avez des images? Envoyez-les et partagez-les super rapidement avec NoelShack!www.noelshack.com
![]()
Visionneuse images - Noelshack - https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2023/21/2/1684871157-aa.jpg
Vous avez des images? Envoyez-les et partagez-les super rapidement avec NoelShack!www.noelshack.com
![]()
Visionneuse images - Noelshack - https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2023/21/2/1684871157-aaa.jpg
Vous avez des images? Envoyez-les et partagez-les super rapidement avec NoelShack!www.noelshack.com
![]()
Visionneuse images - Noelshack - https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2023/21/2/1684871059-img-3438.jpg
Vous avez des images? Envoyez-les et partagez-les super rapidement avec NoelShack!www.noelshack.com
-
It's one of the jewels of my collection. It was gifted to me by an old man I knew.
From what he told me and with the help of after action reports I know the full story behind this knife which is pretty insane. But to make it short :
It belonged to a young soldier of the 5th Falschirmjager division during the battle of the bulge. The US 87th infantry division tried to make some recon missions inside Hatrival, a small village, during the night of the 4th of januray 1945. The recon squad leaded by Sergeant Donald E. Campbell unwillingly started a firefight with the Falschirmjagers in the village and while running back killed a few German soldiers. One of them was buried by the father of the old man who gave me the knife, and when he buried the fallen soldier he saw this knife and took it, he used it to kill chickens/rabbits in his small farm after the war.
(The knife also has the space in the wood like you showed in a previous post)