Third Party Press

KS4349, 1901 Spandau Mauser 7372, located in Pretoria, South Africa

Thank you for the additional photos. That thing is a stunner! The markings are so crisp.
Unfortunately I can’t help with the extra marking on the wrist. Would it be related to its postwar service?
 
Thanks for the kind words.

When were the bolts of these rifles turned down?

I have heard conflicting opinions, some even claiming that this was done in theatre

My reason for asking is the rough state of the wood under the bolt to provide clearance.
20240117_132742.jpg

Then the bolt itself has a crack, as if it was forced without sufficient consideration of the material properties. (As somebody who forges Damascus blades I have some experience in this regard)
20240117_132734.jpg
 
Gew 98

Spandau 1901

K.S. tag 4349

Receiver SN: 7372
Barrel SN: 7373
Front sight SN: 72
Rear sight SN: 72
Sight Slider SN: 72
Ejector box SN: 72
Trigger Sear SN: 72
Front barrel band SN: 72
Rear barrel band SN: 72
Trigger guard SN: 7372
Trigger guard screws SN: 72
Floor Plate SN: 72
Follower SN: 72
Stock SN: 7372
Handguard SN: 7372
Buttplate SN: 7372
Bayonet lug SN: 72
Bolt body SN: 7372
Extractor SN: 72
Safety SN: 72
Cocking piece SN: 72
Bolt sleeve SN: 72
Firing pin SN: 72

Damage to bolt.

20240117_132655.jpg
 
Usually, the armorer who bent the bolt would stamp it with the first initial of his last name. It could be the Z here, but that looks too small compared to the others i've seen.
 
Thanks for the extra photos.

Interesting stamp (first one) behind the trigger guard. No idea what that would be. Probably post WWI as Mantis mentioned.

IIRC the bolts were bent down in theater (Namibia). I imagine the stock was inlet at the time too.
 
The strange marking behind the trigger guard and the possible deployment of the K.S Mausers after World War 1 refers.

According to the publication:

The Problem of Munitions Supply in the First World War and its effect on the Union Defence Force by J.L. Keene; Military History Journal, Vol 6 No 4 - December 1984.

(Refer to: http://samilitaryhistory.org/vol064jk.html)

“Unlike other campaigns in which South African forces participated the execution of the German South West African Campaign was the sole responsibility of the Union Government. Responsibility for the supply of munitions in the other campaigns fell on the Imperial Government. Since South Africa was able to provide her troops with basic equipment for service in the other theatres, especially the East African Campaign, the need for the maintenance of large reserve stocks became unnecessary. This provides a reason for the disposal of large numbers of Portuguese Mausers towards the end of the German South West Africa Campaign. Mention has already been made of the fact that the members of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th Mounted Brigades which served under Gen Botha were allowed to keep their rifles upon release. The rifles were in fact given to these men as a reward for their service. The gift of the rifles was unconditional, no loan or obligation to account for them was implied. The number of rifles involved in the gift was 8 757. These were written off in terms of Government Notice 1366 of 1915.”

This indicates that the UDF operating in other theatres were supplied by the Imperial Government and hence the disposal of the Portuguese Mausers.

“Rifle returns submitted by the Quartermaster-General UDF to the Secretary of Defence in 1915 show that, with the exclusion of the Portuguese Mausers, the bulk of the rifles in the UDF arsenal were .303 in. Magazine Lee Enfields (the ‘long’ Lee Enfields of the pattern used by the British Army in the Boer war.

…. the returns also include 1 699 7,92mm German Mausers which were obviously captured either from rebels who had joined the Germans, such as Maritz’s group, or from the Germans themselves. “

Given that the UDF only had “1699 7.92 German Mausers” it is to my mind highly unlikely that they would bother with the logistics of deploying these.

The number of 1699 7.92 German Mausers in possession of the UDF and a couple of souvenirs brought home by soldiers, seems to corroborate the assumption that some 2200 K.S Mausers were around.

The above mentioned report is well worth a read as it tells an interesting story about the arms of the South West Campaign and the use of the Portuguese Mauser.
( http://samilitaryhistory.org/vol064jk.html)
 
IIRC the bolts were bent down in theater (Namibia). I imagine the stock was inlet at the time too.
That's correct. The bolts were bent and the cut in the stock made in order facilitate better fit into the saddle sheaths. To Cyrus' earlier point, the initial of the armorer who did the work was stamped on the bolt. (You'll see this trend on most post-factory reworks-- probably an accountability piece, but likely lost meaning after inspection and departure from the depot. I even have a depot 98b that has a recycled Gew98 front band where the sling hook was ground off and a letter stamped where the hook used to be)

The 1914 manufactured ones, as well as the radfahrer models from the same year came with factory-bent bolts. They have a much more "professional" angled bend.
 
Thanks for the kind words.

When were the bolts of these rifles turned down?

I have heard conflicting opinions, some even claiming that this was done in theatre

My reason for asking is the rough state of the wood under the bolt to provide clearance.
View attachment 378777

Then the bolt itself has a crack, as if it was forced without sufficient consideration of the material properties. (As somebody who forges Damascus blades I have some experience in this regard)
View attachment 378778

Thanks for the kind words.

When were the bolts of these rifles turned down?

I have heard conflicting opinions, some even claiming that this was done in theatre

My reason for asking is the rough state of the wood under the bolt to provide clearance.
View attachment 378777

Then the bolt itself has a crack, as if it was forced without sufficient consideration of the material properties. (As somebody who forges Damascus blades I have some experience in this regard)
View attachment 378778
Former Schutztruppe gunsmith Joseph Port who wrote some letters in the 1950s about the life and weapons of the Schutztruppe in German SouthWest Africa or DSWA. According to Port, he was in charge when the bending of the rifle bolts was done. The bolt was bent in 1908 in Windhuk. The bolts were bent after the Herero Rebellion of 1904-07 was over. The Schutztruppe acted in a role more like dragoons/mounted infantry and not true cavalry. The rifle with the bent bolt would now fit the leather saddle holster much better. Port also wrote in one of his letters that the bending was a mistake.
The troops didn't liked the bent bolt on Schutztruppengewehr 98. It was much harder and slower to work with then a regular straight G98 bolt.
20240118_102133.jpg
20240118_102147.jpg
The Schutztruppengewehr did not retain the original Lange-Visier. This was a „Visier 88“, this means a rear sight for the cartridge 88 (round nose). The regular „S Visier“ started with 400 m, and it had a rear sight leaf of new construction. The Schutztruppengewehr used a particular model of such a rear sight Leaf, now starting with 200 m, as did the Lange-Visier, but it was scaled for the S-patrone cartridge, and no longer for the cartridge 88. The rear sight leaf was calibrated for the the S-patrone cartridge and were changed in 1910. It is not known if the new rear sight leaf was made in mainland Germany or in the colonies. Given the terrain and geology of German colonies in Africa. From mountainous, densely forested jungles and planes of German East Africa. To the hostile deserts of German SouthWest Africa and Kameroon with its mountains, lowlands and dense rain forest. The 200 m, Lange-Visier would have given the Schutztruppe an advantage on close quarter engagements or long range engagements.
20240118_102058.jpg
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top