Interesting sniper photo

You quoted my post and named me, therefore I had to assume you were referring to me. Please therefore name the person you are then referring to, otherwise it is confusing.
 
You quoted my post and named me, therefore I had to assume you were referring to me. Please therefore name the person you are then referring to, otherwise it is confusing.

Georg
Yes I did quote You . Because You were the one who wrote post #12 . This is what I was replying to (Quote Originally Posted by Absolut View Post. Dave, picture #7 says that is is a press picture. I therefore assume there are more of them in existance?)

I was not referring to the photo in the post

In the above sentence You mentioned Pic #7 I was replying to Your comment about this photo and named You because You wreathe one who wrote it unless I am confused . So I do not understand were the confusion/misunderstanding comes from . Unless I should been more specific about what I was commenting on . Best Regards .
 
Last edited:
OK it gets mixed up, so let me summarize it to get you an insight on why I got confused:

1. In MY post #12 I only mentioned that picture 7 is a press picture and therefore there should be more copies out there. This was dating 12th of June 2018.
2. In YOUR post #15 you quoted MY post #12 and said you only wanted to mention that you own this picture. This was one day later, so 12th of June 2018.

- here now comes a huge gap of time of 4 months -

3. In YOUR post #20 you AGAIN quote MY post #12 and AGAIN replied to my reference that picture 7 is a press picture and that you would be asking to put your name next to them. This was dating 6th November 2018, so 4 months later.
4. in MY post #21 I replied to YOUR post #20 assuming you now would be referring to the picture in the quote, because I did not understand why you would AGAIN refer to picture 7 which was a Press Picture.
5. After YOUR post #22 came clear to me that you wanted to ask the flynaked (OP of the pictures in post #9) to put YOUR NAME next to the pictures HE had posted. I therefore mentioned I was being confused by having been quoted two times for something HE should do.

The poor fate of those who are not native speakers, right?
 
OK it gets mixed up, so let me summarize it to get you an insight on why I got confused:

1. In MY post #12 I only mentioned that picture 7 is a press picture and therefore there should be more copies out there. This was dating 12th of June 2018.
2. In YOUR post #15 you quoted MY post #12 and said you only wanted to mention that you own this picture. This was one day later, so 12th of June 2018.

- here now comes a huge gap of time of 4 months -

3. In YOUR post #20 you AGAIN quote MY post #12 and AGAIN replied to my reference that picture 7 is a press picture and that you would be asking to put your name next to them. This was dating 6th November 2018, so 4 months later.
4. in MY post #21 I replied to YOUR post #20 assuming you now would be referring to the picture in the quote, because I did not understand why you would AGAIN refer to picture 7 which was a Press Picture.
5. After YOUR post #22 came clear to me that you wanted to ask the flynaked (OP of the pictures in post #9) to put YOUR NAME next to the pictures HE had posted. I therefore mentioned I was being confused by having been quoted two times for something HE should do.

The poor fate of those who are not native speakers, right?

Yes that is true as I and other have mentioned many times the difference in languages can cause misunderstandings from time to time . I have no issues at all with my close friends using pictures that belong to me and I hope You know your in that grouping Georg I call friends . Best Regards
 
Back
Top