Hello everyone, this is my first post on the forum. I have been reading more about the G.24(t) recently and wanted to get some insight from those of you with deeper experience. I came across one that just closed on GB earlier today and decided to hold off, but I am second-guessing that call a bit.
The rifle had matching serial numbers, a correct "dou. 42" receiver ring, and Waffenamts including the “eagle H” on the stock. The condition looked solid overall. What held me back was that the stock had clearly been revarnished, and the description noted that the butt had been cut and the buttplate refitted.
From what I could tell, the metal finish and markings looked original and not forced. But I know that with rifles from this period, small details can make a big difference in terms of authenticity and collector value.
Was I right to pass on this one, or did I overthink it? I would really appreciate your thoughts on how much weight that kind of stock modification carries when considering originality and long-term value.
Here is the listing for reference:
Looking forward to learning from the community and contributing where I can. Thanks for your help!
The rifle had matching serial numbers, a correct "dou. 42" receiver ring, and Waffenamts including the “eagle H” on the stock. The condition looked solid overall. What held me back was that the stock had clearly been revarnished, and the description noted that the butt had been cut and the buttplate refitted.
From what I could tell, the metal finish and markings looked original and not forced. But I know that with rifles from this period, small details can make a big difference in terms of authenticity and collector value.
Was I right to pass on this one, or did I overthink it? I would really appreciate your thoughts on how much weight that kind of stock modification carries when considering originality and long-term value.
Here is the listing for reference:
Looking forward to learning from the community and contributing where I can. Thanks for your help!