Absolut
Senior Member
The excellent thread of @chrisftk reminded me that late last year due to a great fellow from this forum who made me aware of a rifle for sale I was able to purchase an all matching Gew98 rifle with bases for the Goerz Semi Turret mount. Actually that rifle even came with a mismatching scope, which came with a scope can that matches to the scope. Even better, the scope was carefully stuffed into the can by period newspapers. When I finally had it I decided I would not use the scope it came with but to put on it another scope of mine, since I had a scope with a rifle number in the same dd letter block as the rifle. That is the one visible in the attached pictures.
I'm not this much of an Imperial collector to be able to tell which manufacturer the rifle is, but I'd assume it is a Danzig - maybe someone can confirm this. What IMHO is very interesting is the fact that it has a 1916 receiver date, this would make it very early, compared to the others that we have posted on this forum (--> Danzig 1918: https://www.k98kforum.com/threads/g98-semi-turret-mount.39258/ and Danzig 1917: https://www.k98kforum.com/threads/1917-danzig-goerz-model-m-semi-turret.46581/ ).
Looking at these two and on my rifle it appears as if the bases on my rifle are sitting more forward on the receiver. As a result to this, the 1916 receiver date is almost fully visible on my rifle. Furthermore, this results in the scope sitting more forward - and therefore requiring the safety to be milled down a little bit at the rear to clear the scope. When I noticed this on my rifle, I looked very close at both above linked rifles and did notice that the Semi Turret sniper rifle from user @JACKDANIELS does have a very lightly milled safety to clear the scope. So this to me means it was kind of individual fitting of the safetey to clear the scope. Just a small detail that though becomes obvious when we have platforms such as this forum which allows us to compare samples from this period.
I'm not this much of an Imperial collector to be able to tell which manufacturer the rifle is, but I'd assume it is a Danzig - maybe someone can confirm this. What IMHO is very interesting is the fact that it has a 1916 receiver date, this would make it very early, compared to the others that we have posted on this forum (--> Danzig 1918: https://www.k98kforum.com/threads/g98-semi-turret-mount.39258/ and Danzig 1917: https://www.k98kforum.com/threads/1917-danzig-goerz-model-m-semi-turret.46581/ ).
Looking at these two and on my rifle it appears as if the bases on my rifle are sitting more forward on the receiver. As a result to this, the 1916 receiver date is almost fully visible on my rifle. Furthermore, this results in the scope sitting more forward - and therefore requiring the safety to be milled down a little bit at the rear to clear the scope. When I noticed this on my rifle, I looked very close at both above linked rifles and did notice that the Semi Turret sniper rifle from user @JACKDANIELS does have a very lightly milled safety to clear the scope. So this to me means it was kind of individual fitting of the safetey to clear the scope. Just a small detail that though becomes obvious when we have platforms such as this forum which allows us to compare samples from this period.