Data on lateral parts support between Mauser manufacturers WW2?
- Thread starter lambo35
- Start date
Well borgiswalde didn't use e/63 anyways.
They e/26.
E/63 was early mauser, then dot/dou
Pics may help. It's possibke the stock is an armourer replacement. Look it over for markings at the wrist. Such as hza4, ku3, etc
They e/26.
E/63 was early mauser, then dot/dou
Pics may help. It's possibke the stock is an armourer replacement. Look it over for markings at the wrist. Such as hza4, ku3, etc
CanadianAR, there is a proof low on the front of the wrist, I'll get a pic of it today and post it.
The top figure looks like a 9 with a u on the bottom of the vertical line. The bottom figure looks like a open top 4 with a serif on the bottom and a chevron beneath it.
Thanx, Chuck.
The top figure looks like a 9 with a u on the bottom of the vertical line. The bottom figure looks like a open top 4 with a serif on the bottom and a chevron beneath it.
Thanx, Chuck.
Attachments
Last edited:
From your description, the buttplate is a replacement part from the depot at Gustrow. The GW3 is the acceptance stamp and under that is H.Za.GW, for Heereszeugamt (army depot) Gustrow. A picture would confirm this. The stock disc sounds like it might be a replacement part also. Take pics of the stamp.
I can't see anything in your one picture of the wrist, but some better pics of the entire stock including all markings would help us identify your stock.