Third Party Press

71/84 lot numbers?

OzzMan

Well-known member
so I’m tearing down a model 71/84 to clean and store in the safe. The gun is overall matching except for some of the parts in the action. The finish matches the rest of the inner action pieces but the numbers do not. Did the 71/84s have a lot or batch number some of these parts? Or are these parts non-matching?

(The serial ends in 22 and the lot number is 973 on the action parts)
 

Attachments

  • C6C170A7-4F6F-4D2A-B433-D19A4DDBDE1A.jpeg
    C6C170A7-4F6F-4D2A-B433-D19A4DDBDE1A.jpeg
    335.8 KB · Views: 11
  • 90D21B7E-0422-49F5-9B85-992B8378EE92.jpeg
    90D21B7E-0422-49F5-9B85-992B8378EE92.jpeg
    392 KB · Views: 11
so I’m tearing down a model 71/84 to clean and store in the safe. The gun is overall matching except for some of the parts in the action. The finish matches the rest of the inner action pieces but the numbers do not. Did the 71/84s have a lot or batch number some of these parts? Or are these parts non-matching?

(The serial ends in 22 and the lot number is 973 on the action parts)
Yes, there were assembly numbers on some of the small internal parts. All of my matching rifles are the same way. I can only guess as to the purpose but I believe it was some sort of internal system of numbering at the factory.
 
Yes, there were assembly numbers on some of the small internal parts. All of my matching rifles are the same way. I can only guess as to the purpose but I believe it was some sort of internal system of numbering at the factory.
This seems to be a common practice for that time frame. I’ve seen Japanese rifles with the same things going on. But Japanese rifles are a lot more fickle as little is none about them. The Japanese didn’t keep the best records of their stuff. Thankfully the Germans did.

Oh the 71/84 is a spandau as well so that might help conclude if it’s a factory practice.
 
This seems to be a common practice for that time frame. I’ve seen Japanese rifles with the same things going on. But Japanese rifles are a lot more fickle as little is none about them. The Japanese didn’t keep the best records of their stuff. Thankfully the Germans did.

Oh the 71/84 is a spandau as well so that might help conclude if it’s a factory practice.
Very true, Bavarian Werders are another example where internal assembly isn't actually matching. The actions on those were made separately by a different company and serialized by them. When an action was mated to a rifle, the outside of it was stamped with the rifle serial number, but if you remove the side plate on the action you will see that all the internal components match the action number not the rifle number.

Storz was pretty blind to this in his book, but with regard to the 71/84 I can only surmise that it was some sort of internal practice that the meaning was lost to time.
 
Just a guess, but most likely these parts were fit when the receiver was just a receiver.
Quite possible. I could also see where they would make the action as a separate assembly at the start and then mate it to the receiver. Similar to how the belgiums did the Comblain.
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top