I was attending the OVMS shot this past weekend in Ohio and an interesting event happened - basically being at the right place and right time.
I was standing at a table and a local "reseller" was complaining to one of our forum members about one of his sales that went south.
I will not elaborate but the short story is that he sold a "matching" rifle to a gentleman that was not happy about the supposed originality of the gun (K98k).
In the end the seller reluctantly honored a return but not before some major complaints about said matching rifle.
So the seller blamed me and the book for his misfortune. He was not aware that I was standing right behind him so I listened quietly not interrupting his
conversation.
I will not go into detail about the rifle but apparently is was missing some key aspects known to factory matching rifles.
So to blame me and the book? I was not shocked. He basically created his own "alternate universe" of fact to justify a humped rifle.
I thought that blaming the book (Volume II) was a great excuse for his misfortune.
Our books are not perfect by any means but we believe they are a pretty good source of fact and a good guide to vetting K98ks.
For a known questionable seller to blame the facts does not surprise me. It goes hand in hand with putting profits first and the hell with originality.
As in any hobby where values increase over time, you will have as these "carny barkers" weasel in and do their damage.
It is the stated purpose of this forum to help prevent this by any means, and in support of that, our books.
Best to all!
Bruce
I was standing at a table and a local "reseller" was complaining to one of our forum members about one of his sales that went south.
I will not elaborate but the short story is that he sold a "matching" rifle to a gentleman that was not happy about the supposed originality of the gun (K98k).
In the end the seller reluctantly honored a return but not before some major complaints about said matching rifle.
So the seller blamed me and the book for his misfortune. He was not aware that I was standing right behind him so I listened quietly not interrupting his
conversation.
I will not go into detail about the rifle but apparently is was missing some key aspects known to factory matching rifles.
So to blame me and the book? I was not shocked. He basically created his own "alternate universe" of fact to justify a humped rifle.
I thought that blaming the book (Volume II) was a great excuse for his misfortune.
Our books are not perfect by any means but we believe they are a pretty good source of fact and a good guide to vetting K98ks.
For a known questionable seller to blame the facts does not surprise me. It goes hand in hand with putting profits first and the hell with originality.
As in any hobby where values increase over time, you will have as these "carny barkers" weasel in and do their damage.
It is the stated purpose of this forum to help prevent this by any means, and in support of that, our books.
Best to all!
Bruce