Third Party Press

My first mauser and som questions about barrel.

Hi guys, my first post here. Im about to buy my first mauser, a 1936 s/42. Most numbers matching exept som of the smaller bits. What is confusing me is that there is very little markings on the barrel. its stamped KAL. 7.92 on the side and what apears to be a small lion on the top. Also it has a sight hood, witch i think is not periode correct, also the stock is laminated. Has anyone here seen thoose marikings on the barrel? My theory is that during the war, this rifle was sent to be (fixed up) It is for sure not a RC as i have never seen a RC rifle in my country(Norway). Any feedback will be much appreciated
20140218_164654.jpg
20140218_164759.jpg
20140218_165015.jpg
 
So, the barrel is a postwar replacement barrel. I am sure the Kal. 7.92 marking was applied in Norway. The laminated stock is likely a replacement item. Look in the barrel channel to see if it is numbered to the rifle. If it is numbered to the rifle (original German serial number), then it was likely replaced by the Germans during the war. If it is not matching in the barrel channel, then more than likely it was replaced after the war.
 
Great. Now i cant wait untill it comes in the mail, and i can inspect the barrel more closely. And hopefully my k98 bayonet will fit
 
First, Thanks for the replys. Sorry Im bombarding with questions here, Any thoughts about the stock? mauser stocks that i have seen goes from almost black colour to as bright as the one im waiting on. where they originaly staind? or is mine as would be out of the factory? really considering getting a new stock with flat butt plate, that would be correct for 1936.
Regarding the barrel, ive done som research. and we had a big weapons factory here in norway (kongsberg) that supplyed the germans with replacement parts and evan some Krag-Jørgensen`s with eagle and swastika. The norwegians army converted a lot of mauser`s after the war, too 30-06 at Kongsberg. And all the serials where where scratched over and restampt, Almost like a RC. The theory now is that, its a replacement barrel, made at kongsberg fractory in wartime.
 
Hopefully you know this person. Armslist has a lot of scams going on right now with K98,s Beware!!!!
 
No it cant be a Mitchell's. Very diffycult to buy arms from the states. I actually considerd that, and Mitchell's wanted 1000$ just for the transportation. And then i found out that its near impossible to import arms to Norway. So the chances of it beeing a Mitchell's is very unlikley. And authentic K98`s are cheaper in Norway than Mitchell's mausers anyway :) I figure, either i have made a really good deal. Or i have a OK rifle at a OK price. The guy i bought it from seems really nice. he was gonna slaughter the rifle just for the bolt and action. To make a custom hunting rifle. Witch i have to say is fairly common here unfortunately. But desided it was to good of a rifle to do that, so he offerd it to me.
 
Last edited:
Oh,I just noticed you are out of the states. Gun looks Great but resembles what you would receive from Mitchells.
 
The stock looks just like a stock that I have which is a Norwegian capture. The blued butt plate and light color of the wood are the same. All of the pimped out Mitchell`s that I`ve seen have a nice shiny buttplate to match their nice shiny bolts, that goes for the ones with light stocks( collector and premium grade) and the ones with the RC red stocks ( they call it a souvenir grade now, was service grade) that they sell. Of course no matter what they call them, they are crap.
Here`s a pic of my Norwegian stock. The close up of the butt was shot indoors so the color looks a little darker.
 

Attachments

  • K98k 00075.jpg
    K98k 00075.jpg
    277.1 KB · Views: 40
  • K98k 00077.jpg
    K98k 00077.jpg
    326.6 KB · Views: 37
I see. Is yours the type that is converted to 30-06 and has all the serial numbers scratched over? Would stripping the stock to bear wood and then a cupple of layers with BLO be the best way to get it back to original?
 
No, it`s not converted to 30-06. I got this K98 from a friend who lived in California and had purchased it there some years back. He needed a little money and offered it to me. Actually it is an RC,the stock that was on it when I first got it was still covered in a thick coat of Russian Red and had a major lamination seperation problem that resulted in a crack that ran from the recoil lug to almost the butt plate. There had been an attempt to repair the seperation at some time that I figured the Russians had done since it was covered in the loverly red shellac. I got the Norwegian stock from a fellow forum member ( Ranger-1). It came with numbers matching bands and hand guard. The butt plate is typical Norwegian capture, blued and original serial numbers lined out. I also replaced the trigger guard and floor plate with a matching to itself set I got from Tommy (us1945), so it`s Norwegian too. All of the WaA`s are present as are the eagles and swastikas. I found out, with the help of forum members, that not only is it an RC, but also passed through the hands of Mitchell`s. There is an extra line across the RC X, making it into a "snowflake" and the bolt ( that I replaced) was deblued, pimp shined and renumbered to match the receiver. So what I have is an RC receiver and barrel that match. An e/135 bolt that has mostly e/135 parts and the rest is Norwegian capture e/135.
As far as what you should do with the stock is up to you. There is a very thin coat of clear (shellac?) on mine and I am fine with it at this point. Hell of a lot better that Russian Red. I wiped the stock down with a clean dry rag when I first got it and that`s it so far. I`m sure that others here can tell you the best way to remove the shelllac, if that is your intentions, without harming the wood. I did remove the Russian Red on the other stock just to see what was under it. Since I wasn`t worried about doing anymore damage to the RC stock, I used a gel type remover that a forum member suggested (sorry I can`t remember the name of it). It took almost all of the red shellac off with no further damage to the wood or lamination. It was easy to apply and wiped off with a rag.
Hope that I have been of some help to you.
Grimlin13

Nice K98 by the way. I consider it a better fifle than an RC and far more better than a Mitchell`s could ever be
 
Last edited:
Yeah, u have been a lot of help. Thank you. And im really appriciating the comments here. Excuse my english btw. Im to lazy to google the spelling on words im not sure about. since most parts are matching numbers except some minor parts. And only damage done is the stock and what is probably a newer blueing. Im going to just "try at least" to make the stock more periode correct. I will post a lot of more Photos when it actually arrives in the mail sometime next week, If you guys are interested? I feel like i did when i was 10 years old, waiting for the first Nintendo 8bit at xmas.hehehe
 
That is the color those laminated stocks normally turn when sanded then given a polyurethane finish. It is a nice color but not original. The barrel is a replacement, probably marked that way so as not to be mixed up with barrels made for .30-'06.

Jim
 
Any thought on whats the best way to get the stock a more original finish? from what i have gathered is stripping and BLO the way to go? i want it to also look a bit darker. Most likely about the rifle is that it came in to privat hands after the war, and the owner threw out the dirty old stock and replaced it with a norwegian re-finished one :-(
 
Any thought on whats the best way to get the stock a more original finish? from what i have gathered is stripping and BLO the way to go? i want it to also look a bit darker. Most likely about the rifle is that it came in to privat hands after the war, and the owner threw out the dirty old stock and replaced it with a norwegian re-finished one :-(

I would not do anything to the stock, it is correct for a Norwegian reworked rifle the way it is. Every Norwegian 98k I have handled the stock is exactly like that and the three other Norwegian stocks I bought are the same.
 
Well, If it was the totaly reworked rifle (30.06) with all new norwegian army and serial stamps. I wouldt care at all. To me that its not a k98 and their as cheap as dirt here. lol. Mine has all the original markings and most numbers matching. Witch means it came into privat hands after the war, and some farmer desided to fix it up most likely. But barrel and stock are the big issues. I can live with the barral, at least its in the correct kal. but the stock will be an "easy" way to make it look more athentic. Anyway, it still has not arrived in the mail :( I will make a new thread when it arrives and post lots of photos. Hopefully i will hears some opinions :)
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top