It could be, but no real way to tell unless you get it tested...Could it be blood?
How hard is that process? Might be interesting to find outIt could be, but no real way to tell unless you get it tested...
Definitely wouldn’t if it damaged the stock but it would be cool to find out if they have another methodDon't know, likely you'd at least need to take some scrapings from the wood, which would impact the stock, so I don't think i would if it had to be destructive means...but maybe they could use a flouroscope or something? Never researched how to do it...
Probably
the only thing I wasn’t expecting/excited for was the slightly cleaned receiverI’m thinking someone was just really excited to get a Simson![]()
I’ve got one for you. Here’s mine:the only thing I wasn’t expecting/excited for was the slightly cleaned receiver![]()
Oh yeah, I've stumbled across this one quite a few times XD. The dream is to collect a rifle from each year they were producing during the war. love that it's a lower serial number even for 1915, (right?). Also, the acceptance marks all around, especially on the butt swivel base, are so clear! Incredible example!I’ve got one for you. Here’s mine:
![]()
1915 Simson Gew98
I decided to post pictures of this first year Simson finally. I haven't been able to do much photography of late, as even retired life is sometimes a whirlwind. These are older photos and even some of the original sellers pictures from the auction 10+ years ago. I'm pretty sure Paul already has...www.k98kforum.com
Nice!! Any photos? Mine was actually a 472 built by John Aruzza.To Hemi nut . I had a 500 ci Keith Black .