Figure show off what I have coming home. A BCD 42, that far as can tell only trigger doesn't match.
My guess would be no, but we need you take the buttplate off and check the stock supplier code and finish date to be able to help you wether it would have had a numbered rod or not. There was a order in 1942 (which month it was escapes me) that production was too be simplified because of the rifle shortage and parts started to be serialized less, based on your type 2 milled barrel band I would venture too say your rifle was produced after that order for manufacturers came out, even rifles with visibly cracked receivers were used (cracked receiver rifles would have the cracks welded up a bit and reinspected again, there is and example shown in volume 2a or 2b)While cleaning up my k98, found a nice little surprise I've never noticed. Never seen a numbered cleaning rod in my life, so never looked. But under light noticed mine was stamped 84. We're they still numbered in late 41 early 42?
View attachment 423056View attachment 423057
Bumping Stephan's post for additional photos/information. I meant to comment about the trigger and 'factory errors', which are often claimed to explain away mismatched parts. I'd be inclined to suggest this is just that, as it's a part not subject to being lost or broken and e/18 would be correct for possible supplier.Congratulations to your new rifle, it's a special K98k.
Please show the trigger and another thing is very important, take a photo of the stock completion date code, it's hidden behind the buttplate.
My assumption is that the stock was completed in July, in the 30th calendar week of 1942. Thursday, July 23, 1942 could have been the exact day. If my assumption is correct, you could find the code "Mü 4 30 42" behind the buttplate.
Complete parts breakdown incase anyone researched or collected info for research info. I found limited info on BCD 42 rifles, and most pronounced things was seemed to use allot of contractor parts to assemble rifles around this time from what I read.
Trigger housing: waa623 over 4884 (Steyr provided)
Only reason looks plausible is the font matches rest of the gustloff 4's(4s different on bnz marked rifles from what seen) and the wear matches the gustloff floor plate making look together from beginning. Just an oddity that's annoying lol.BobJ & PeterK were good early researchers, along with Ken Huddle, J Steen and Mark Weiringa probably the best back then. Gustloff Weimar was a assembler mostly, they mostly made barrels andlittle else for the 98k, few enough of these,they are rather rare. The small group of firms in Saxony and Thuringia were the main parts suppliers for rifle assmebly, and that was what bcd was (they did make many things of importace though) but they rarely use Suhl maker parts.