Third Party Press

bcd 43 patchwork family

Hello from good old germany!

I own a few handguns and just bought my first rifle. I initially thought this one would become a shooter for some time for me and then I seel it again (paid 500 EUR bucks). But then I got excited by the K98k history started to dig a bit deeper. I found it interesting / funny that I bought (unknowingly) a "true german version" of that rifle family. Honestly, I was just looking for any kind of K98 at that time.

Much respect to this forum here by the way, lots of skilled people! I find e.g. the blueprints and the numbering section very helpful. I alread read many threads and start to fear that this grows into some kind of addiction if I keep moving at this speed...

Also a couple of "brother rifles" out here so I hope you can help me with some questions on my rifle's "identity crisis"...

Here is - what I think - I know so far - please correct me if I'm wrong:
- Gustloff Werke, assembled in '43
- serial number 1870bb - at least for a certain fraction of it
- Russian capture
- re-activated by Frankonia München in 5KF - may 2016
- nice sophisticated way of hand engraved serial numbering on the "loader" (Verschluß - please excuse missing vocabulary in terms of rifles!)

Here is what I would like to know:
- Do you think the 1870 on the stock is original?
- What is this strange numbering on the barrel? Is it simply a different serial number (ch 3H7810) or is it another reference?
- I understood the Gustloff plant in Weimar was a large assembler, not a big manufacturer and they got supplier parts from lots of different locations. Is it "ok" in that sense for this Karabiner that the bajonett hook is not blued?
- Is this rifle missing a "Kornschutz"? So the protector around the forward aiming point?
- Is the forward band the correct one or should it be the "H-shaped" one?
- Is a red extractor probably ok for Gustloff rifles?
- Last one: the cleaning rod does surely have its hole in the bajonett hook, but the stock doesnt have the acutal hole in it to accomodate the rod. Nevertheless, I read somewhere that the rods where anyway not used so much during the late war time any more and the Wehrmacht decided to provide something like a bore snake for cleaning to the soliders. So since my rifle is from '43, it might have already been manufactured with a "cost and time saving change" to not drill this hole anymore into the stock. Does that make sense or is my stock fake in the sense of being a replica?

THANK YOU for helping me to get some orientation!

Cheers,

Rülpsilon
 

Attachments

  • 01.JPG
    01.JPG
    107.6 KB · Views: 12
  • 04.JPG
    04.JPG
    227 KB · Views: 12
  • 05.JPG
    05.JPG
    124.4 KB · Views: 12
  • 06.JPG
    06.JPG
    255.9 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_5417.JPG
    IMG_5417.JPG
    144.6 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_5420.JPG
    IMG_5420.JPG
    114.1 KB · Views: 12
  • LHRQ6558.JPG
    LHRQ6558.JPG
    186.4 KB · Views: 10
  • PRXM1664.JPG
    PRXM1664.JPG
    225.2 KB · Views: 7
  • 02a.JPG
    02a.JPG
    293.6 KB · Views: 9
  • 03a.JPG
    03a.JPG
    218.8 KB · Views: 9
  • QJOT8714a.JPG
    QJOT8714a.JPG
    296.9 KB · Views: 11
  • 07a.JPG
    07a.JPG
    274.1 KB · Views: 12
the stock is off a dou or is a stock used by dou I should say. Has the post war added rear recoil lug also.. Its an RC anything goes
 
Russian capture k98ks are made up of parts from dozens of k98ks. Your stock and barraled receiver did not leave the factory together. From the sounds of it, you have a late 44 or early 45 dot/swp stock. They were not drilled for a cleaning rod.
 

Military Rifle Journal
Back
Top